These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17804312)

  • 1. The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars.
    Burleson A; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2007 Jul; 33(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 17804312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo antibacterial efficacy of ultrasound after hand and rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
    Carver K; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1038-43. PubMed ID: 17931928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
    Gutarts R; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2005 Mar; 31(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 15735461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study.
    Vera J; Siqueira JF; Ricucci D; Loghin S; Fernández N; Flores B; Cruz AG
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1040-52. PubMed ID: 22794203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment.
    Nair PN; Henry S; Cano V; Vera J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 15660098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy.
    Canoglu H; Tekcicek MU; Cehreli ZC
    Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 17249433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
    Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
    Klyn SL; Kirkpatrick TC; Rutledge RE
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1367-71. PubMed ID: 20647098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.
    Thomas AR; Velmurugan N; Smita S; Jothilatha S
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1676-80. PubMed ID: 25052146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canal and isthmus debridement efficacy of the VPro EndoSafe negative-pressure irrigation technique.
    Sarno MU; Sidow SJ; Looney SW; Lindsey KW; Niu LN; Tay FR
    J Endod; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1631-4. PubMed ID: 23146651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction in bacterial counts in infected root canals after rotary or hand nickel-titanium instrumentation--a clinical study.
    Rôças IN; Lima KC; Siqueira JF
    Int Endod J; 2013 Jul; 46(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 23331179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic debridement comparing sodium hypochlorite and water.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 1919404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic appliances on root canal debridement].
    Chen CP; Yeh CL; Yang YK; Ma CC; Nieh S
    Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1990 Jun; 9(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 2104285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of sodium hypochlorite activated by ultrasound for the debridement of infected, immature root canals.
    Cameron JA
    J Endod; 1986 Nov; 12(11):550-4. PubMed ID: 3465863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction of hard-tissue debris accumulation during rotary root canal instrumentation by etidronic acid in a sodium hypochlorite irrigant.
    Paqué F; Rechenberg DK; Zehnder M
    J Endod; 2012 May; 38(5):692-5. PubMed ID: 22515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of biofilm removal with hand, rotary nickel-titanium, and self-adjusting file instrumentation using a novel in vitro biofilm model.
    Lin J; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 23611386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.