144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17804361)
1. The application of the Olmstead decision on housing and eldercare.
Palley E; Rozario PA
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):81-96. PubMed ID: 17804361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the Courts to Shape Medicaid Policy: Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring and Its Community Integration Legacy.
Rosenbaum S
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Aug; 41(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 27127257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Judicial Threats to
Mangan JG; Dennis AL
Psychiatr Serv; 2024 Jun; 75(6):589-593. PubMed ID: 38088039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court confronts AIDS: expanded coverage.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Jul; 13(13):1, 3-10. PubMed ID: 11365574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Olmstead decision and the journey toward integration:the evolution of social work responses.
Yong F
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):115-26. PubMed ID: 17804363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court confronts HIV: reflections on Bragdon v. Abbott.
Parmet WE
J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):225-40, 179. PubMed ID: 11066881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. US: Supreme Court adopts narrow definition of "disability" under anti-discrimination law.
Elliott R
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 6(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 14979273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court to rule on rights of people with disabilities.
Gold S
Caring; 1999 Jul; 18(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 10539554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Olmstead's implementation: Differences in enforcement approaches.
Avila A; Spaulding WD; Evans EA
Psychol Serv; 2022 May; 19(2):243-251. PubMed ID: 34110868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Safeguarding the ADA's Antidiscrimination Mandate: Subjecting Arrests to Title II Coverage.
Rifkin Sh
Duke Law J; 2017 Jan; 66(4):913-41. PubMed ID: 28117564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the Olmstead decision five years later:a national perspective for social workers.
Zendell AL
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):97-113. PubMed ID: 17804362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Here's a look at status of court rulings on ADA. First key decision involved HIV-infected person.
AIDS Alert; 2001 Feb; 16(2):18, 23-4. PubMed ID: 15446222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Olmstead decision: landmark opportunity or platform for rhetoric? Our collective responsibility for full community participation.
Cottrell RP
Am J Occup Ther; 2005; 59(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 16268023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008: implications for the forensic psychiatrist.
Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 20305081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CRIPA, Olmstead, and the transformation of the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board.
Bloom JD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 22960921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mitigating measures cases now in Supreme Court's hands.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 May; 14(9):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 11366951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bragdon vs Abbott: US Supreme Court set to re-examine HIV as a disability.
Zuniga J
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care; 1998 May; 4(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 11365189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Realizing the Promise of
Schwartz SJ; Fleischner RD; Schwartz AZ; Stephens EM
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):63-100. PubMed ID: 32400309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Congress restores the Americans With Disabilities Act to its original intent.
Petrila J
Psychiatr Serv; 2009 Jul; 60(7):878-9. PubMed ID: 19564215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Where We are on the Twentieth Anniversary of
Sloan L; Gulrajani C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 31811081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
