BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17804586)

  • 1. CD36 gene deletion reduces fat preference and intake but not post-oral fat conditioning in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K; Abumrad NA
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2007 Nov; 293(5):R1823-32. PubMed ID: 17804586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Greater reductions in fat preferences in CALHM1 than CD36 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2018 Sep; 315(3):R576-R585. PubMed ID: 29768036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GPR40 and GPR120 fatty acid sensors are critical for postoral but not oral mediation of fat preferences in the mouse.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2013 Dec; 305(12):R1490-7. PubMed ID: 24154510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Apr; 129():64-72. PubMed ID: 24582671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source.
    Ackroff K; Lucas F; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Jul; 85(4):448-60. PubMed ID: 15990126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fat preference deficits and experience-induced recovery in global taste-deficient Trpm5 and Calhm1 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2022 Mar; 246():113695. PubMed ID: 34998826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of lipolysis in postoral and oral fat preferences in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2018 Sep; 315(3):R434-R441. PubMed ID: 29668321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learned suppression of intake based on anticipated calories: cross-nutrient comparisons.
    Warwick ZS; Bowen KJ; Synowski SJ
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 62(6):1319-24. PubMed ID: 9383120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Sclafani A; Glass DS; Margolskee RF; Glendinning JI
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2010 Dec; 299(6):R1643-50. PubMed ID: 20926763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.
    Sclafani A; Glendinning JI
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2005 Sep; 289(3):R712-20. PubMed ID: 15845881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fat and carbohydrate preferences in mice: the contribution of alpha-gustducin and Trpm5 taste-signaling proteins.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Glendinning JI; Margolskee RF
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2007 Oct; 293(4):R1504-13. PubMed ID: 17652359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.
    Zukerman S; Glendinning JI; Margolskee RF; Sclafani A
    Chem Senses; 2013 Jun; 38(5):421-37. PubMed ID: 23547138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Marambaud P; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Mar; 126():25-9. PubMed ID: 24384370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. STIM1 regulates calcium signaling in taste bud cells and preference for fat in mice.
    Dramane G; Abdoul-Azize S; Hichami A; Vögtle T; Akpona S; Chouabe C; Sadou H; Nieswandt B; Besnard P; Khan NA
    J Clin Invest; 2012 Jun; 122(6):2267-82. PubMed ID: 22546859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MCH receptor deletion does not impair glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Sclafani A; Adamantidis A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Sep; 163():239-244. PubMed ID: 27195455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fat infusions in rats.
    Lucas F; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1989 Sep; 46(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 2623061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The gustatory pathway is involved in CD36-mediated orosensory perception of long-chain fatty acids in the mouse.
    Gaillard D; Laugerette F; Darcel N; El-Yassimi A; Passilly-Degrace P; Hichami A; Khan NA; Montmayeur JP; Besnard P
    FASEB J; 2008 May; 22(5):1458-68. PubMed ID: 18162488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strain differences in muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonism of fat intake and acquisition and expression of fat-conditioned flavor preferences in male BALB/c, C57BL/6 and SWR mice.
    Iskhakov B; Dohnalova P; Iskhakova J; Mustac T; Yuabov A; Macanian J; Israel E; Locurto N; Franz N; Fazilov G; Shenouda M; Bodnar RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2019 Dec; 187():172792. PubMed ID: 31593740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.