These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study. Veasey RA; Arya A; Silberbauer J; Sharma V; Lloyd GW; Patel NR; Sulke AN Europace; 2011 Jun; 13(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21208945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ventricular pacing vs dual chamber pacing in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation: open randomized study. Petrac D; Radić B; Radeljić V; Hamel D; Filipović J Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):922-8. PubMed ID: 16342345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA; Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. Connolly SJ; Kerr CR; Gent M; Roberts RS; Yusuf S; Gillis AM; Sami MH; Talajic M; Tang AS; Klein GJ; Lau C; Newman DM N Engl J Med; 2000 May; 342(19):1385-91. PubMed ID: 10805823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of low interatrial septum and right atrial appendage pacing for prevention of permanent atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus node disease: results from the electrophysiology-guided pacing site selection (EPASS) study. Verlato R; Botto GL; Massa R; Amellone C; Perucca A; Bongiorni MG; Bertaglia E; Ziacchi V; Piacenti M; Del Rosso A; Russo G; Baccillieri MS; Turrini P; Corbucci G Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2011 Dec; 4(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 21946316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation. Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of site and rate of atrial pacing on long-term progression of atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome: Septal Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Evaluation (SAFE) Study. Lau CP; Tachapong N; Wang CC; Wang JF; Abe H; Kong CW; Liew R; Shin DG; Padeletti L; Kim YH; Omar R; Jirarojanakorn K; Kim YN; Chen MC; Sriratanasathavorn C; Munawar M; Kam R; Chen JY; Cho YK; Li YG; Wu SL; Bailleul C; Tse HF; Circulation; 2013 Aug; 128(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 23868858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single chamber atrial pacing: a realistic option in sinus node disease: a long-term follow-up study of 213 patients. Höijer CJ; Höglund P; Schüller H; Brandt J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jun; 30(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 17547606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease. Tripp IG; Armstrong GP; Stewart JT; Hood MA; Smith WM Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 28(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 15826261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]