132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17804891)
1. Analysis of the rigid and deformable component of setup inaccuracies on portal images in head and neck radiotherapy.
Birkner M; Thorwarth D; Poser A; Ammazzalorso F; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5721-33. PubMed ID: 17804891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An on-line replanning method for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy.
Ahunbay EE; Peng C; Godley A; Schultz C; Li XA
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4776-90. PubMed ID: 19928108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance.
van Kranen S; van Beek S; Rasch C; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1566-73. PubMed ID: 19306753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image-guided patient positioning: if one cannot correct for rotational offsets in external-beam radiotherapy setup, how should rotational offsets be managed?
Murphy MJ
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1880-3. PubMed ID: 17654888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linac-based on-board imaging feasibility and the dosimetric consequences of head roll in head-and-neck IMRT plans.
Kim GY; Pawlicki T; Le QT; Luxton G
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18262130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective feasibility trial of radiotherapy target definition for head and neck cancer using 3-dimensional PET and CT imaging.
Scarfone C; Lavely WC; Cmelak AJ; Delbeke D; Martin WH; Billheimer D; Hallahan DE
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):543-52. PubMed ID: 15073248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic registration and fusion of ultrasound with CT for radiotherapy.
Wein W; Röper B; Navab N
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):303-11. PubMed ID: 16685973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D surface imaging system for patient setup in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
Gopan O; Wu Q
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):547-52. PubMed ID: 22365627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local setup errors in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients immobilized with a custom-made device.
Giske K; Stoiber EM; Schwarz M; Stoll A; Muenter MW; Timke C; Roeder F; Debus J; Huber PE; Thieke C; Bendl R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jun; 80(2):582-9. PubMed ID: 20934279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A methodology to determine margins by EPID measurements of patient setup variation and motion as applied to immobilization devices.
Prisciandaro JI; Frechette CM; Herman MG; Brown PD; Garces YI; Foote RL
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2978-88. PubMed ID: 15587650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comment on "Image-guided patient positioning: if one cannot correct for rotational offsets in external-beam radiotherapy setup, how should rotational offsets be managed?" [Med. Phys. 34, 1880-1883 (2007)].
Verellen D; Soete G; Erbel S; Labsik U
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4064-5; author reply 4066-7. PubMed ID: 17985651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation method of nonrigid registration algorithms for adaptive radiotherapy.
Rodriguez-Vila B; Gaya F; Garcia-Vicente F; Gomez EJ
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1137-45. PubMed ID: 20384249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Daily ultrasound-based image-guided targeting for radiotherapy of upper abdominal malignancies.
Fuss M; Salter BJ; Cavanaugh SX; Fuss C; Sadeghi A; Fuller CD; Ameduri A; Hevezi JM; Herman TS; Thomas CR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(4):1245-56. PubMed ID: 15234062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Hong TS; Tomé WA; Chappell RJ; Chinnaiyan P; Mehta MP; Harari PM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):779-88. PubMed ID: 15708257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of patient setup in the seated treatment position: A novel treatment chair design.
McCarroll RE; Beadle BM; Fullen D; Balter PA; Followill DS; Stingo FC; Yang J; Court LE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):223-229. PubMed ID: 28291911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy.
Zhang L; Garden AS; Lo J; Ang KK; Ahamad A; Morrison WH; Rosenthal DI; Chambers MS; Zhu XR; Mohan R; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Apr; 64(5):1559-69. PubMed ID: 16580505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of treatment setup errors between two CT scans for patients with head and neck cancer.
Ezzell LC; Hansen EK; Quivey JM; Xia P
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3233-42. PubMed ID: 17879786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance-based treatment planning for prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy: creation of digitally reconstructed radiographs.
Chen L; Nguyen TB; Jones E; Chen Z; Luo W; Wang L; Price RA; Pollack A; Ma CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(3):903-11. PubMed ID: 17544002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
