These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17804896)

  • 1. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
    Gebhardt E; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The computation of equating errors in international surveys in education.
    Monseur C; Berezner A
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):323-35. PubMed ID: 17804897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plausible values: how to deal with their limitations.
    Monseur C; Adams R
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):320-34. PubMed ID: 19671992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Translation equivalence across PISA countries.
    Grisay A; de Jong JH; Gebhardt E; Berezner A; Halleux-Monseur B
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):249-66. PubMed ID: 17804893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.
    Skaggs G; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard setting with dichotomous and constructed response items: some Rasch model approaches.
    MacCann RG
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):438-54. PubMed ID: 19934530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G; Gómez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of differential investment of student effort on the outcomes of international studies.
    Butler J; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):279-304. PubMed ID: 17804895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expanding an existing multiple choice test with a mixed format test: simulation study on sample size and item recovery in concurrent calibration.
    Paek I; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 17068379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
    Arce-Ferrer AJ
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18180550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test equating in the presence of DIF items.
    Chu KL; Kamata A
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):342-54. PubMed ID: 15942075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing examinations that use equal raw scores for cut scores.
    Swanlund A; Smith E
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 21164230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Programme for International Student Assessment: an overview.
    Turner R; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 17804892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rasch simultaneous vertical equating for measuring reading growth.
    Lee OK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 12700428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.