1041 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17805018)
1. Results of femoral intramedullary nailing in patients who are obese versus those who are not obese: a prospective multicenter comparison study.
Tucker MC; Schwappach JR; Leighton RK; Coupe K; Ricci WM
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Sep; 21(8):523-9. PubMed ID: 17805018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
Ricci WM; Schwappach J; Tucker M; Coupe K; Brandt A; Sanders R; Leighton R
J Orthop Trauma; 2006; 20(10):663-7. PubMed ID: 17106375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures.
Helmy N; Jando VT; Lu T; Chan H; O'Brien PJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18176159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of knee function after antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal femoral fractures: results of isokinetic evaluation.
Daglar B; Gungor E; Delialioglu OM; Karakus D; Ersoz M; Tasbas BA; Bayrakci K; Gunel U
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):640-4. PubMed ID: 19897985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures combined with neck or distal femur fractures. A retrospective review of 25 cases, with a follow-up of 36-150 months.
Okcu G; Aktuglu K
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Dec; 123(10):544-50. PubMed ID: 13680274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.
Shroeder JE; Mosheiff R; Khoury A; Liebergall M; Weil YA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):653-7. PubMed ID: 19897987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective functional outcome and motion analysis evaluation of the hip abductors after femur fracture and antegrade nailing.
Archdeacon M; Ford KR; Wyrick J; Paterno MV; Hampton S; Ludwig MB; Hewett TE
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18176158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How comparable is so-called standard fracture fixation with an identical implant? A prospective experience with the antegrade femoral nail in South Africa and Europe.
Gross T; Huettl T; Audigé L; Frey C; Monesi M; Seibert FJ; Messmer P
Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 19900673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison study between reamed and unreamed nailing of closed femoral fractures.
Selvakumar K; Saw KY; Fathima M
Med J Malaysia; 2001 Dec; 56 Suppl D():24-8. PubMed ID: 14569762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures.
Ricci WM; Bellabarba C; Evanoff B; Herscovici D; DiPasquale T; Sanders R
J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 11265005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study of antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures].
Li WY; Zhang BS; Zhang L; Zheng SH; Wang Sm
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Mar; 22(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 19366103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limb malalignment and functional outcome after antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures.
Salem KH; Maier D; Keppler P; Kinzl L; Gebhard F
J Trauma; 2006 Aug; 61(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 16917453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting the results of distal femoral fractures treated by retrograde intramedullary nailing.
Kim JW; Oh CW; Kyung HS; Min WK; Yoon SH
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 23(11):1311-5. PubMed ID: 19968169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the results of the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade locked intramedullary nailing and retrograde locked intramedullary nailing].
Liu XH; Sun L; Jiang XY; Wang MY; Zhang LD
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 87(13):902-5. PubMed ID: 17650402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Avoidance of malreduction of proximal femoral shaft fractures with the use of a minimally invasive nail insertion technique (MINIT).
Russell TA; Mir HR; Stoneback J; Cohen J; Downs B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 18594303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrograde femoral nailing and knee function.
Murray P; Bergin P; Labropoulos P; Gunther S
Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 19226019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of knee function in patients with a healed fracture of the femoral shaft fixed with retrograde and antegrade intramedullary nailing.
Andrzejewski K; Panasiuk M; Grzegorzewski A; Synder M
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 15(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 24431251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exchange nailing for aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft: a retrospective cohort study for effect of reaming size.
Wu CC
J Trauma; 2007 Oct; 63(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 18090018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective randomized comparative study of antegrade and retrograde locked nailing for middle humeral shaft fracture.
Cheng HR; Lin J
J Trauma; 2008 Jul; 65(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18580523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The incidence of non-union following unreamed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures.
el Moumni M; Leenhouts PA; ten Duis HJ; Wendt KW
Injury; 2009 Feb; 40(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 19070840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
