249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17805261)
21. UK government caught in GM dilemma.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):957. PubMed ID: 12949540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. EPA issues, USDA amends respective biotech rules.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jun; 15(6):503. PubMed ID: 9181563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Trace and traceability--a call for regulatory harmony.
Ramessar K; Capell T; Twyman RM; Quemada H; Christou P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 18779799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Environmental regulation. U.S. courts say transgenic crops need tighter scrutiny.
Charles D
Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5815):1069. PubMed ID: 17322039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. GM crop data-agronomy and ecology in tandem.
Stewart CN; Wheaton SK
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 11135511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
König A
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Tougher rules aim to prevent gene flow into crops.
Hoag H
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):103. PubMed ID: 12634744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
Teng PP
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Terminator no solution to gene flow.
Shand H
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):775-6. PubMed ID: 12147996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. EU biotech crop regulations and environmental risk: a case of the emperor's new clothes?
Morris SH
Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 17113665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops.
Kalaitzandonakes N; Alston JM; Bradford KJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. USDA appeases organic lobby.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):217. PubMed ID: 10096276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cloned animals deemed safe to eat, but labeling issues loom.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 18327214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Nutritional and safety assessment of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology--case studies by the International Food Biotechnology Committee of ILSI.
Glenn KC
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():229-32. PubMed ID: 18296343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Animals aren't drugs.
Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7218):2. PubMed ID: 18987684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology.
Delaney B; Astwood JD; Cunny H; Conn RE; Herouet-Guicheney C; Macintosh S; Meyer LS; Privalle L; Gao Y; Mattsson J; Levine M;
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46 Suppl 2():S71-97. PubMed ID: 18348900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Drugs in crops--the unpalatable truth.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):133. PubMed ID: 14755274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Japanese experience with the Blue Book and subsequent activities in environmental biosafety of GM crops.
Hayashi K
Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17640516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
