These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17805261)
41. The emerging international regulatory framework for biotechnology. Komen J GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 22430851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals. Mandal GN William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops. Kalaitzandonakes N; Alston JM; Bradford KJ Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Cloned animals deemed safe to eat, but labeling issues loom. Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 18327214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Nutritional and safety assessment of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology--case studies by the International Food Biotechnology Committee of ILSI. Glenn KC Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():229-32. PubMed ID: 18296343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Japanese experience with the Blue Book and subsequent activities in environmental biosafety of GM crops. Hayashi K Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17640516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The environmental impact subterfuge. Conko G; Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1256-8. PubMed ID: 21139607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars. McHughen A; Smyth S Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate". Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech. Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 18779798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops. Stokstad E Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry. Miller HI Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The gap between science and perception: the case of plant biotechnology in Europe. Einsele A Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():1-11. PubMed ID: 17522817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Agbiotech. USDA decides against new regulation of GM crops. Stokstad E Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6017):523. PubMed ID: 21292947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]