188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1781880)
1. The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations.
Price RB; Gerrow JD; Sutow EJ; MacSween R
Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 1781880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I: Single die.
Chaffee NR; Bailey JH; Sherrard DJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 9051599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Dimensional change and deformation on stone dies for full cast crowns. Differences according to impression methods using vinyl silicone impression materials].
Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe M; Tejima R; Takigawa T
Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1989 Jun; 27(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 2700283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stone.
Al-Abidi K; Ellakwa A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):17-28. PubMed ID: 16957787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
Breeding LC; Dixon DL
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM
Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
Ayad MF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy die material using different polymerization methods.
Prisco R; Cozzolino G; Vigolo P
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19054302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Measuring the accuracy of various elastomeric impression materials using a CNC coordinate measuring device (Part 1)].
Wichmann M; Borchers L; Limmroth E
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Aug; 45(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 2269183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials.
Kenyon BJ; Hagge MS; Leknius C; Daniels WC; Weed ST
J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15733132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
Wise M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique.
Ratnaweera PM; Yoshida K; Miura H; Kohta A; Tsuchihira K
J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Sep; 50(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15074361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface detail reproduction of Type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Schelb E; Cavazos E; Troendle KB; Prihoda TJ
Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1784720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
