BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17821983)

  • 1. IMAT-SIM: a new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT).
    Iori M; Cagni E; Nahum AE; Borasi G
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2759-73. PubMed ID: 17821983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
    Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
    Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating geometric ray tracing to generate initial conditions for intensity modulated arc therapy optimization.
    Oliver M; Gladwish A; Craig J; Chen J; Wong E
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3137-50. PubMed ID: 18697539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementing RapidArc into clinical routine: a comprehensive program from machine QA to TPS validation and patient QA.
    Van Esch A; Huyskens DP; Behrens CF; Samsoe E; Sjolin M; Bjelkengren U; Sjostrom D; Clermont C; Hambach L; Sergent F
    Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5146-66. PubMed ID: 21978060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
    Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
    Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery.
    Zhao YL; Mackenzie M; Kirkby C; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3491-500. PubMed ID: 18777909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interplay effect on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free linear accelerator with high dose rate and fast multi-leaf collimator motion treating breast and lung phantoms.
    Netherton T; Li Y; Nitsch P; Shaitelman S; Balter P; Gao S; Klopp A; Muruganandham M; Court L
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2369-2376. PubMed ID: 29611210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
    Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Leaf-sequencing for intensity-modulated arc therapy using graph algorithms.
    Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Chen DZ; Shepard DM; Yu CX
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18293562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An oscillating sweeping gap test for VMAT quality assurance.
    Bhagwat MS; Han Z; Ng SK; Zygmanski P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5029-44. PubMed ID: 20702923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
    McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation on the impact of the leaf trailing effect using the Halcyon integrated platform system.
    Pérez Azorín JF; Saez J; Ramos Garcia LI; Hernandez V
    Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):6161-6170. PubMed ID: 35770385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commissioning of the tongue-and-groove modelling in treatment planning systems: from static fields to VMAT treatments.
    Hernandez V; Vera-Sánchez JA; Vieillevigne L; Saez J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(16):6688-6707. PubMed ID: 28639942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.
    Otto K
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):310-7. PubMed ID: 18293586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of leaf width and plan complexity on DMLC tracking of prostate intensity modulated arc therapy.
    Pommer T; Falk M; Poulsen PR; Keall PJ; O'Brien RT; Munck af Rosenschöld P
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111717. PubMed ID: 24320425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IMRT implementation and patient specific dose verification with film and ion chamber array detectors.
    Sathiyan S; Ravikumar M; Varatharaj C; Supe SS; Keshava SL
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2010 Jul; (8):20-7. PubMed ID: 20601335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.
    Sun B; Rangaraj D; Boddu S; Goddu M; Yang D; Palaniswaamy G; Yaddanapudi S; Wooten O; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3837. PubMed ID: 22955649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.
    Berwouts D; Olteanu LA; Speleers B; Duprez F; Madani I; Vercauteren T; De Neve W; De Gersem W
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():52. PubMed ID: 27039294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.