832 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17822010)
21. The impact of automatic tube current modulation related settings of a modern GE CT scanner on image quality and patient dose; details do matter.
Tsalafoutas IA; AlKhazzam S; Kharita MH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 25(6):e14356. PubMed ID: 38659159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Considerations on an automatic computed tomography tube current modulation system.
Moro L; Panizza D; D'Ambrosio D; Carne I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Oct; 156(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 23584497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [New Potential Method for Optimizing the ATCM Technique in Pediatric CT Examination].
Yoshiura T; Masuda T; Matsumoto Y; Sato T; Kikuhara Y; Kobayashi Y; Ishibashi T; Oku T; Funama Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(8):802-807. PubMed ID: 32814735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A routine quality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systems.
Iball GR; Moore AC; Crawford EJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 27455490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in CT: A pediatric oncology perspective.
Brady SL; Yee BS; Kaufman RA
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5520-31. PubMed ID: 22957619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs.
Bohrer E; Schäfer S; Mäder U; Noël PB; Krombach GA; Fiebich M
Z Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 27(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 27720574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of iodine concentration and scan parameters on image quality, contrast enhancement and radiation dose in thoracic CT.
Solbak MS; Henning MK; England A; Martinsen AC; Aaløkken TM; Johansen S
Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Sep; 4(1):57. PubMed ID: 32915405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating patient dose from CT exams that use automatic exposure control: Development and validation of methods to accurately estimate tube current values.
McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon CH; Yu L; Leng S; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4262-4275. PubMed ID: 28477342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relationship between the radiation doses at nonenhanced CT studies using different tube voltages and automatic tube current modulation during anthropomorphic phantoms of young children.
Masuda T; Funama Y; Kiguchi M; Osawa K; Suzuki S; Oku T; Sugisawa K; Shouji T; Awai K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):232-243. PubMed ID: 28984023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dosimetry and adequacy of CT-based attenuation correction for pediatric PET: phantom study.
Fahey FH; Palmer MR; Strauss KJ; Zimmerman RE; Badawi RD; Treves ST
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 17293575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Projection Quality-Driven Tube Current Modulation Method in Cone-Beam CT for IGRT: Proof of Concept.
Men K; Dai J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1179-1186. PubMed ID: 29332447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
