832 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17822010)
41. CT dose reduction using Automatic Exposure Control and iterative reconstruction: A chest paediatric phantoms study.
Greffier J; Pereira F; Macri F; Beregi JP; Larbi A
Phys Med; 2016 Apr; 32(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 27056436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Characterization of radiation dose from tube current modulated CT examinations with considerations of both patient size and variable tube current.
Li X; Yang K; Liu B
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5413-5422. PubMed ID: 28681439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Automatic tube-current modulation in CT--a comparison between different solutions.
Althén JN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):308-12. PubMed ID: 15933127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study.
Schindera ST; Winklehner A; Alkadhi H; Goetti R; Fischer M; Gnannt R; Szucs-Farkas Z
Clin Radiol; 2013 Feb; 68(2):e79-86. PubMed ID: 23219454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The relevance of image quality indices for dose optimization in abdominal multi-detector row CT in children: experimental assessment with pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Brenot J; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; Savignoni A; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):1871-92. PubMed ID: 19265204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Assessment of image quality on effects of varying tube voltage and automatic tube current modulation with hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal/pelvic CT: a phantom study.
Vardhanabhuti V; Loader R; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2013 Mar; 48(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 23344519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms-effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance.
Jahnke P; Conzelmann J; Genske U; Nunninger M; Scheel M; Hamm B; Diekhoff T
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3177-3186. PubMed ID: 33151393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of z-axis resolution and image noise for nonconstant velocity spiral CT data reconstructed using a weighted 3D filtered backprojection (WFBP) reconstruction algorithm.
Christner JA; Stierstorfer K; Primak AN; Eusemann CD; Flohr TG; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):897-906. PubMed ID: 20229899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantitative Image Quality and Histogram-Based Evaluations of an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm at Low-to-Ultralow Radiation Dose Levels: A Phantom Study in Chest CT.
Lee KB; Goo HW
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 29354008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Preliminary results: prospective clinical study to assess image-based iterative reconstruction for abdominal computed tomography acquired at 2 radiation dose levels.
Pourjabbar S; Singh S; Singh AK; Johnston RP; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Do S; Padole A; Blake MA; Persson A; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 24424560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience.
Marin D; Nelson RC; Schindera ST; Richard S; Youngblood RS; Yoshizumi TT; Samei E
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 20032149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis.
Kalra MK; Maher MM; Toth TL; Kamath RS; Halpern EF; Saini S
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15286306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]