145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17822487)
1. Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children.
Lo EC; Holmgren CJ; Hu D; van Palenstein Helderman W
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 35(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17822487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in school children].
Hu DY; Wan HC; Liu HC; Li X; Fan X; Lo EC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 14989868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results.
Luo Y; Wei SH; Fan MW; Lo EC
Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Dec; 2(3-4):73-8. PubMed ID: 10863422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E
SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Survival of single surface ART-restorations in Zimbabwe after 3 years].
Frencken JE
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Jun; 106(6):214-8. PubMed ID: 11930476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen G
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
Markovic D; Peric T
Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of multiple-surface ART restorations: 12 month follow-up.
Cefaly DF; Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Fagundes TC; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 18482515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
Smales RJ; Yip HK
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 3-year follow-up study of preformed beta-quartz glass-ceramic insert restorations.
Sjögren G; Hedlund SO; Jonsson C; Sandström A
Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11203902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C
Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children--results after three years.
Holmgren CJ; Lo EC; Hu D; Wan H
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2000 Aug; 28(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 10901411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
