These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17823644)

  • 1. Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix perimetry.
    Hong S; Na K; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 42(5):707-11. PubMed ID: 17823644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
    De Tarso Pierre-Filho P; Gomes PR; Pierre ET; Pierre LM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(3):538-41. PubMed ID: 20099239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension.
    Centofanti M; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; Orzalesi N; Vetrugno M; Manni G; Rossetti L
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 18794676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between indices of Humphrey matrix and Humphrey perimetry in early glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Hong S; Yeom HY; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie); 2007; 39(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 18025653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
    Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ
    Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between indices of Humphrey perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in glaucoma.
    Fukushima A; Shirakashi M; Yaoeda K; Funaki S; Funaki H; Ofuchi N; Abe H
    J Glaucoma; 2004 Apr; 13(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 15097256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Felletti M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
    Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.
    Kocabeyoglu S; Uzun S; Mocan MC; Bozkurt B; Irkec M; Orhan M
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):576-9. PubMed ID: 24145558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure.
    Nakagawa S; Murata H; Saito H; Nakahara H; Mataki N; Tomidokoro A; Iwase A; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21543995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of learning effect on frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix).
    Contestabile MT; Perdicchi A; Amodeo S; Recupero V; Recupero SM
    J Glaucoma; 2007 May; 16(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 17438423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    ChiseliĊ£a D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.