These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1782437)

  • 1. [Mechanical resistance of endodontically treated upper first premolar crowns].
    Marcoli PA; Pasini S; Visconti L; Bellagamba F
    G Ital Endod; 1991; 5(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 1782437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures.
    Reeh ES; Messer HH; Douglas WH
    J Endod; 1989 Nov; 15(11):512-6. PubMed ID: 2639947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars.
    Linn J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):479-85. PubMed ID: 7714419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative investigation of dynamic loading of prepared and intact human premolars.
    Catović AM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jun; 23(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 1502324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cusp coverage on the fracture resistance of premolars with endodontic access cavities.
    ElAyouti A; Serry MI; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2011 Jun; 44(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 21276020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remaining tooth structure associated with various preparation designs for the endodontically treated maxillary second premolar.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 16011232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance in conservative Class II cavity preparation: box vs tunnel.
    Khairy MA
    Egypt Dent J; 1994 Jul; 40(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 9588153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns.
    Forberger N; Göhring TN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.
    Zhi-Yue L; Yu-Xing Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 12690349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compressive fracture resistance of the marginal ridge in large Class II tunnels restored with cermet and composite resin.
    Ehrnford LE; Fransson H
    Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(5):207-11. PubMed ID: 7871480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal ridge strength in Class II tunnel restorations.
    Fasbinder DJ; Davis RD; Burgess JO
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 1854444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Influence of cavity preparation on mechanical resistance of teeth].
    Lopes LM; Leitão JG; Douglas WH
    Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1991; 31(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 2041972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoring the endodontically treated bi-rooted premolar--the effect of endodontic and post preparation on width of root dentin.
    Yaman P; Zillich R
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1986 Feb; 68(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 3517346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.