These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17824381)

  • 1. Guns or buffer.
    McCormick D
    Biotechniques; 2007 Aug; 43(2):139. PubMed ID: 17824381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flat NIH funding threatens scientific progress.
    J Nucl Med; 2007 May; 48(5):15N, 22N. PubMed ID: 17475944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5814):927. PubMed ID: 17303728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Funding opportunities: angiogenesis in the nervous system in health and disease.
    Liu CY
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Apr; 62(4):N7-8. PubMed ID: 18496176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The more things change..
    Frank M
    Physiologist; 2011 Feb; 54(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 21384774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Big money, little science?
    Nat Immunol; 2008 Nov; 9(11):1199. PubMed ID: 18936775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New president, new congress..... new hope for science?
    Wolinetz CD
    Physiologist; 2009 Feb; 52(1):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 19271423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oh no! Not another acronym?
    Wallner PE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Sep; 1(9):629. PubMed ID: 17411670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Windfall warning.
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moderation in science budgeting.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1993 Apr; 260(5108):603. PubMed ID: 8480167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinton proposes $2.8 billion increase in science funding.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6768):349. PubMed ID: 10667757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinton's farewell gift to US science agencies.
    Macilwain C; Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6770):585. PubMed ID: 10688168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 1997 budget confirms US science faces a period of flat funding.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):714-5. PubMed ID: 18258869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment: Academic return.
    Eisenstein M
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7601):S20-1. PubMed ID: 27144604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Election impasse leaves science in the dark.
    Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):279. PubMed ID: 11099007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Less rosy view of science funding.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 1996 Jul; 382(6586):18. PubMed ID: 8657296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.
    Baldwin W; McCardle P
    Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The specter of fraud.
    Reich ES
    Sci Am; 2009 Jul; 301(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 19555016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health spending differentials.
    Marmor T
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; 23(6):271; author reply 272-3. PubMed ID: 15537607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.