BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17825003)

  • 1. Sample size determination for hierarchical longitudinal designs with differential attrition rates.
    Roy A; Bhaumik DK; Aryal S; Gibbons RD
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 17825003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random effects probit and logistic regression models for three-level data.
    Gibbons RD; Hedeker D
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1527-37. PubMed ID: 9423267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.
    Lu K; Mehrotra DV; Liu G
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):679-99. PubMed ID: 19051207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power analyses for longitudinal trials and other clustered designs.
    Tu XM; Kowalski J; Zhang J; Lynch KG; Crits-Christoph P
    Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(18):2799-815. PubMed ID: 15344187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-outs.
    Little R; Yau L
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1324-33. PubMed ID: 8962456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extension of the rank sum test for clustered data: two-group comparisons with group membership defined at the subunit level.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ; Lee ML
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1251-9. PubMed ID: 17156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating treatment efficacy over time: a logistic regression model for binary longitudinal outcomes.
    Choi L; Dominici F; Zeger SL; Ouyang P
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2789-805. PubMed ID: 16134133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculation for multicenter randomized trial: taking the center effect into account.
    Vierron E; Giraudeau B
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 17188941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating cost in power analysis for three-level cluster-randomized designs.
    Konstantopoulos S
    Eval Rev; 2009 Aug; 33(4):335-57. PubMed ID: 19509118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative drop-out.
    Ten Have TR; Kunselman AR; Pulkstenis EP; Landis JR
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):367-83. PubMed ID: 9544529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A priori power analysis in longitudinal three-level multilevel models: an example with therapist effects.
    de Jong K; Moerbeek M; van der Leeden R
    Psychother Res; 2010 May; 20(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 19946814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1305-15. PubMed ID: 12687656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for modelling change in cluster randomization trials.
    Klar N; Darlington G
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(15):2341-57. PubMed ID: 15273952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.
    Pickering RM; Weatherall M
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5445-56. PubMed ID: 17924360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and sample size estimation in clinical trials with clustered survival times as the primary endpoint.
    Xie T; Waksman J
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2835-46. PubMed ID: 12953283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies for analyzing multilevel cluster-randomized studies with binary outcomes collected at varying intervals of time.
    Olsen MK; DeLong ER; Oddone EZ; Bosworth HB
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6055-71. PubMed ID: 18825655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.