256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17825024)
1. Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs.
Albert PS
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 17825024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds using survival methods.
Putter H; Fiocco M; Stijnen T
Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):95-110. PubMed ID: 19924701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of imperfect diagnostic tests had an impact on prevalence estimation.
Ihorst G; Forster J; Petersen G; Werchau H; Rohwedder A; Schumacher M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):902-10. PubMed ID: 17689806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Joint estimation of diagnostic accuracy measures for paired organs--application in ophthalmology.
de Leon AR; Soo A; Bonzo DC; Rudnisky CJ
Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):837-50. PubMed ID: 19697307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.
Cai T; Cheng S
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 18056687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
Su CL; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of raters without a gold standard by exploiting a group of experts.
Zhang B; Chen Z; Albert PS
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 23006010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: a multiple latent variable model.
Dendukuri N; Hadgu A; Wang L
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):441-61. PubMed ID: 19067379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of different approaches to report diagnostic accuracy.
Vermeersch P; Bossuyt X
Arch Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 170(8):734-5. PubMed ID: 20421562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Using and interpreting diagnostic tests.
McKenna SL; Dohoo IR
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 22(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 16517302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
Gilchrist JM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A sequential design to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic or screening test.
Wruck LM; Yiannoutsos CT; Hughes MD
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3458-73. PubMed ID: 16374904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
