These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1782519)

  • 1. Inhibitory mechanisms of attention: locus, stability, and relationship with distractor interference effects.
    Tipper SP; Weaver B; Kirkpatrick J; Lewis S
    Br J Psychol; 1991 Nov; 82 ( Pt 4)():507-20. PubMed ID: 1782519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probe distractors can influence negative priming by perceptual grouping.
    Yeh YY; Chao HF
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 15129743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].
    Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F
    Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Determinants of occurrence of negative priming for novel shapes with matching paradigm].
    Endo N; Saiki J; Saito H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2001 Aug; 72(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11697274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre-cuing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors.
    Fox E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 7754085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The control of visual attention and its influence on prioritized processing in a location negative priming paradigm.
    Fischer R; Hagendorf H
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):317-35. PubMed ID: 16151719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Input control processes in rapid serial visual presentations: target selection and distractor inhibition.
    Olivers CN; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 17002523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial attention in early vision.
    Theeuwes J; Kramer AF; Atchley P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2001 Jun; 108(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11485190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related brain potential variations during location and identity negative priming.
    Kathmann N; Bogdahn B; Endrass T
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Feb; 394(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 16263217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where has all the inhibition gone? Insights from electrophysiological measures into negative priming without probe distractors.
    Groh-Bordin C; Frings C
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 19619926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The availability of attentional resources modulates the inhibitory strength related to weakly activated priming.
    Wang Y; Wang Y; Liu P; Dai D; Di M; Chen Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1655-64. PubMed ID: 27198916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
    Paas F; Adam JJ
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
    Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition and habituation: preserved mechanisms of attentional selection in aging and Alzheimer's disease.
    Langley LK; Overmier JB; Knopman DS; Prod'Homme MM
    Neuropsychology; 1998 Jul; 12(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 9673993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The negative priming effect as an inhibitory phenomenon].
    Yokoyama H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1996 Dec; 67(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 9121015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.
    Harris IM; Benito CT; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1595-608. PubMed ID: 20718560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus.
    Wang L; Duan Y; Theeuwes J; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25280985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional inhibition in patients with focal frontal lobe lesions.
    McDonald CR; Bauer RM; Filoteo JV; Grande L; Roper SN; Gilmore R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 May; 27(4):485-503. PubMed ID: 15962693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture and inhibition (of return): the effect on perceptual sensitivity.
    Theeuwes J; Chen CY
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Nov; 67(8):1305-12. PubMed ID: 16555583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and nonmasked primes in a spatial negative priming task.
    Fitzgeorge L; Buckolz E; Khan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1435-52. PubMed ID: 21479723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.