These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1782519)
21. Distractor eccentricity and its effect on selective attention. Chen Z Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 18444518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Distractor interference in selective reaching: dissociating distance and grouping effects. Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J J Mot Behav; 2003 Jun; 35(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 12711583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom. Cave KR; Chen Z Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1822-38. PubMed ID: 27250363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors. Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effects of cueing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm. Richards A Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):449-63. PubMed ID: 10428686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming. Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):744-56. PubMed ID: 26233234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study. Jiang Y; Chun MM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task. Buckolz E; Goldfarb A; Khan M Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):837-45. PubMed ID: 15495908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience? Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Target activation and distractor inhibition underlie priming of pop-out: A response to Dent (this issue). Lamy D; Zivony A Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():131-138. PubMed ID: 29678539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention. Benoni H; Tsal Y Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Attentional capture by a salient distractor in visual search: the effect of target-distractor similarity. Poiese P; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 19071990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search. Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hulleman J Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):81-101. PubMed ID: 15912874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]