351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17825530)
1. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro.
Olszewski R; Zech F; Cosnard G; Nicolas V; Macq B; Reychler H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 36(9):828-33. PubMed ID: 17825530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses.
Olszewski R; Tanesy O; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 38(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 19574058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional architectural and structural analysis--a transition in concept and design from Delaire's cephalometric analysis.
Lee SH; Kil TJ; Park KR; Kim BC; Kim JG; Piao Z; Corre P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 43(9):1154-60. PubMed ID: 24794759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method.
Olmez H; Gorgulu S; Akin E; Bengi AO; Tekdemir I; Ors F
Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21261485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.
Jodeh DS; Kuykendall LV; Ford JM; Ruso S; Decker SJ; Rottgers SA
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1568-1571. PubMed ID: 31299770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software.
Olszewski R; Cosnard G; Macq B; Mahy P; Reychler H
Neuroradiology; 2006 Nov; 48(11):853-62. PubMed ID: 17009024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility assessment of Delaire cephalometric analysis using reconstructions from computed tomography.
Debelmas A; Ketoff S; Lanciaux S; Corre P; Friess M; Khonsari RH
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 121(1):35-39. PubMed ID: 31055092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data.
Pittayapat P; Bornstein MM; Imada TS; Coucke W; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 25161199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Schoenarts N; Khonsari RH; Odri GA; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2407-2414. PubMed ID: 28004246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a simple method for measuring cranial deformities (plagiocephalometry).
van Adrichem LN; van Vlimmeren LA; Cadanová D; Helders PJ; Engelbert RH; van Neck HJ; Koning AH
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 18216659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
