286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17826495)
1. Thermal energy-free laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: one-year potency outcomes.
Gill IS; Ukimura O
Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 17826495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: refined technique.
Gill IS; Ukimura O; Rubinstein M; Finelli A; Moinzadeh A; Singh D; Kaouk J; Miki T; Desai M
Urology; 2005 Jan; 65(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15667856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rogers CG; Su LM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Wagner A; Pavlovich CP
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2448-52. PubMed ID: 17085126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single institution 2-year patient reported validated sexual function outcomes after nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez E; Finley DS; Skarecky D; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 19013596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Briganti A; Fabbri F; Salonia A; Gallina A; Chun FK; Dehò F; Zanni G; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 17418936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early patient self-assessed outcomes of nerve-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy.
Wiygul JB; Harris MJ; Dahm P
Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):582-6. PubMed ID: 16140082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing.
Finley DS; Rodriguez E; Skarecky DW; Ahlering TE
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(10):1484-9. PubMed ID: 19388985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early release of the neurovascular bundles and optical loupe magnification lead to improved and earlier return of potency following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Chuang MS; O'Connor RC; Laven BA; Orvieto MA; Brendler CB
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 15643241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of statin therapy on early return of potency after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Hong SK; Han BK; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee SE
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):613-6. PubMed ID: 17570410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate: surgical and functional outcomes.
Menard J; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Yiou R; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 18762050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of unilateral sural nerve graft on recovery of potency and continence following radical prostatectomy: 3-year longitudinal study.
Namiki S; Saito S; Nakagawa H; Sanada T; Yamada A; Arai Y
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):212-6; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 17499797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Siriraj Hospital.
Srinualnad S; Nualyong C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):730-6. PubMed ID: 17487128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydrodissection of neurovascular bundles during open radical prostatectomy improves postoperative potency.
Patel MI; Spernat D; Lopez-Corona E
J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):233-7. PubMed ID: 21575963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Michl UH; Friedrich MG; Graefen M; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):227-31. PubMed ID: 16753406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
