These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center. Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrity and amplification of nucleic acids from snap-frozen prostate tissues from robotic-assisted laparoscopic and open prostatectomies. Voss BL; Santiano K; Milano M; Mangold KA; Kaul KL Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Apr; 137(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 23544941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens. Hong H; Mel L; Taylor J; Wu Q; Reeves H Diagn Pathol; 2012 Mar; 7():24. PubMed ID: 22414134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis. Martinschek A; Heinzelmann K; Ritter M; Heinrich E; Trojan L J Endourol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 22489895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Schroeck FR; Krupski TL; Stewart SB; BaƱez LL; Gerber L; Albala DM; Moul JW J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):894-8. PubMed ID: 22245326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Moulin M; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 23245815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The learning curve of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: what is the evidence? Secin FP Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):830-8. PubMed ID: 22052764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Chung SD; Kelle JJ; Huang CY; Chen YH; Lin HC BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E966-71. PubMed ID: 22540425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biobanking of derivatives from radical retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy tissues as part of the prostate cancer biorepository network. Darshan M; Zheng Q; Fedor HL; Wyhs N; Yegnasubramanian S; Lee P; Melamed J; Netto GJ; Trock BJ; De Marzo AM; Sfanos KS Prostate; 2014 Jan; 74(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24115205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Albala DM; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Moul JW BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]