These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17826604)

  • 1. Bicortical microimplant with 2 anchorage heads for mesial movement of posterior tooth in the beagle dog.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17826604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of bicortical orthodontic microimplant on tooth movement in dogs].
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF
    Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Sep; 35(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 17063540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini-implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog.
    Ohmae M; Saito S; Morohashi T; Seki K; Qu H; Kanomi R; Yamasaki KI; Okano T; Yamada S; Shibasaki Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 11343020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endosseous titanium implants as anchors for mesiodistal tooth movement in the beagle dog.
    Saito S; Sugimoto N; Morohashi T; Ozeki M; Kurabayashi H; Shimizu H; Yamasaki K; Shiba A; Yamada S; Shibasaki Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 11113792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of the Nance appliance as an anchorage-reinforcement method.
    Al-Awadhi EA; Garvey TM; Alhag M; Claffey NM; O'Connell B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 25726400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and histologic analysis of the stability of microimplants with immediate orthodontic loading in dogs.
    Chen Y; Kang ST; Bae SM; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 19651357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of miniplates and teeth for orthodontic anchorage.
    Kim S; Herring S; Wang IC; Alcalde R; Mak V; Fu I; Huang G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):189.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18249283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading.
    Chen Y; Lee JW; Cho WH; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 20362909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minor tooth movements using microimplant anchorage: case reports.
    Sohn DS; Lee JK; An KM
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 18332756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental evaluation of tooth movement in the beagle dog with the mini-screw implant for orthodontic anchorage.
    Owens SE; Buschang PH; Cope JB; Franco PF; Rossouw PE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 18005838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrusion of multiradicular teeth and related root resorption with mini-screw implant anchorage: a radiographic evaluation.
    Carrillo R; Rossouw PE; Franco PF; Opperman LA; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):647-55. PubMed ID: 18005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment of alveolar cleft with distraction osteogenesis using anchorage with a tooth-microimplant joint in a dog model.
    Huang DY; Zhang JB; Li X; Chen SL
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 50(7):e104-8. PubMed ID: 22209447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.
    Chen Y; Shin HI; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18174070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
    Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage in initial orthodontic retraction.
    Wahabuddin S; Mascarenhas R; Iqbal M; Husain A
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Pavithranand A; Rajasigamani K; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 16627183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Freire JN; Silva NR; Gil JN; Magini RS; Coelho PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):704.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of screw diameter on orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Morarend C; Qian F; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Grosland NM; Morgan TA; McManus M; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 19651352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of corticotomy-facilitated vs standard tooth-movement techniques in dogs with miniscrews as anchor units.
    Mostafa YA; Mohamed Salah Fayed M; Mehanni S; ElBokle NN; Heider AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 19815161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.