447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17826654)
1. Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?
Stav K; Judith S; Merald H; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Zisman A
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 17826654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan.
Yokomizo A; Murai M; Baba S; Ogawa O; Tsukamoto T; Niwakawa M; Tobisu K; Kinukawa N; Naito S
BJU Int; 2006 Sep; 98(3):549-53. PubMed ID: 16925752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer.
Gofrit ON; Zorn KC; Taxy JB; Lin S; Zagaja GP; Steinberg GD; Shalhav AL
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1925-8. PubMed ID: 17868725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PSA velocity is associated with gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen: marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Loeb S; Sutherland DE; D'Amico AV; Roehl KA; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1116-20; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 18571700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].
Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.
Sengupta S; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Zincke H; Myers RP; Riehle DL; Pankratz VS; Blute ML; Sebo TJ
Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 16844452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
