118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17826937)
1. Image quality assessment using the CD-DISC phantom for vascular radiology and vascular surgery.
Struelens L; Hambach L; Buls N; Smans K; Malchair F; Hoornaert MT; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 17826937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY: A PHANTOM-BASED STUDY.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Gatzounis GD; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30508126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses.
Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H; Van Loon R; Geukens M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of image quality and patient exposure in fluoroscopy using a phantom: Is there any clinical relevance?
Tsalafoutas IA; Tsapaki V; Triantopoulou I
Eur J Radiol; 2021 May; 138():109607. PubMed ID: 33667936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Smeets PV; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):374-380. PubMed ID: 31985603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality and radiation dose in planar imaging - Image quality figure of merits from the CDRAD phantom.
Konst B; Weedon-Fekjaer H; Båth M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):151-159. PubMed ID: 31152576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of dynamic phantoms in interventional radiology.
Guibelade E; Vañó E; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K; Fernández JM; Ten JI; Rawlings DJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):155-9. PubMed ID: 11487827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology.
Thomas JA; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek R; Romanyukha A
Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):807-14. PubMed ID: 15839353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image-quality figure evaluator based on contrast-detail phantom in radiography.
Wang CL; Wang CM; Chan YK; Chen RT
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22213357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Criteria to optimise a dynamic flat detector system used for interventional radiology.
Simon R; Vano E; Prieto C; Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Martinez D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):261-4. PubMed ID: 18304958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability in radiation dose and image quality: A comparison across fluoroscopy-system vendors, generations of equipment and institutions.
Hill KD; Mann SD; Carboni MP; Doyle TP; Idriss SF; Janssen DF; Nicholson GT; Sathanandam S; Fleming GA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):E471-E477. PubMed ID: 30208245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Introduction of a New Parameter for Evaluation of Digital Radiography System Performance.
Choopani MR; Chaparian A
J Med Signals Sens; 2020; 10(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 33062611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose reduction and static image quality assessment using a channelized hotelling observer on an angiography system upgraded with clarity IQ.
Ortenzia O; Trojani V; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Iori M; Ghetti C
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Feb; 6(2):025008. PubMed ID: 33438634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative performance evaluation of a flat detector and an image intensifier angiographic system both used for interventional cardiology procedures in adult and pediatric patients.
Kordolaimi SD; Salvara AL; Antonakos I; Tsalafoutas IA; Broutzos E; Efstathopoulos EP
Phys Med; 2013 Mar; 29(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22398332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Examination of Dose Reduction Using Image Noise Reduction Technology in Cardiovascular X-ray Systems].
Saijo T; Seguchi S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(6):451-459. PubMed ID: 28637959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vascular guide wire navigation with a magnetic guidance system: experimental results in a phantom.
Schiemann M; Killmann R; Kleen M; Abolmaali N; Finney J; Vogl TJ
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):475-81. PubMed ID: 15215549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study.
Hasegawa H; Sato J; Kobayashi I
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Jun; 11(2):138-148. PubMed ID: 29488072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
