These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17827279)

  • 1. Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences.
    Todd PM; Penke L; Fasolo B; Lenton AP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Sep; 104(38):15011-6. PubMed ID: 17827279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potentials-attract or likes-attract in human mate choice in China.
    He QQ; Zhang Z; Zhang JX; Wang ZG; Tu Y; Ji T; Tao Y
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e59457. PubMed ID: 23565153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The synergistic effect of prosociality and physical attractiveness on mate desirability.
    Ehlebracht D; Stavrova O; Fetchenhauer D; Farrelly D
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 109(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 29250771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jul; 111(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 27337140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Impact of Health, Wealth, and Attractiveness on Romantic Evaluation from Photographs of Faces.
    Tskhay KO; Clout JM; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Nov; 46(8):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 28255792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chinese undergraduates' preferences for altruistic traits in mate selection and personal advertisement: Evidence from Q-sort technique.
    Guo Q; Feng L; Wang M
    Int J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):145-153. PubMed ID: 26334113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: an evolutionary perspective.
    Ben Hamida S; Mineka S; Bailey JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Oct; 75(4):953-66. PubMed ID: 9825529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-Rated Attractiveness Moderates the Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Romantic Ideals in Women.
    Birkás B; Láng A; Meskó N
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Feb; 121(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 29298572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in preference for risky behaviors during courtship.
    Prokop P; Pazda A
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 61(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 32103513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human nonindependent mate choice: is model female attractiveness everything?
    Vakirtzis A; Roberts SC
    Evol Psychol; 2012 May; 10(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 22947636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolution of human mate choice.
    Geary DC; Vigil J; Byrd-Craven J
    J Sex Res; 2004 Feb; 41(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 15216422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical attractiveness, attitudes toward career, and mate preferences among young Chinese women.
    Zhang H; Teng F; Chan DK; Zhang D
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 12(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 24525338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society.
    Buston PM; Emlen ST
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Jul; 100(15):8805-10. PubMed ID: 12843405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blind dates and mate preferences: an analysis of newspaper matchmaking columns.
    Kelley JM; Malouf RA
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 23282582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 17682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.