These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17827279)

  • 21. What's in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mating desirability.
    Wlodarski R; Dunbar RI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 25299759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jul; 52(5):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 37245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):543-551. PubMed ID: 33057831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evolution of human mate choice.
    Geary DC; Vigil J; Byrd-Craven J
    J Sex Res; 2004 Feb; 41(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 15216422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sex Differences in Response to Deception Across Mate-Value Traits of Attractiveness, Job Status, and Altruism in Online Dating.
    Desrochers J; MacKinnon M; Kelly B; Masse B; Arnocky S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Nov; 50(8):3675-3685. PubMed ID: 34664152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 17682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. People overestimate their willingness to reject potential romantic partners by overlooking their concern for other people.
    Joel S; Teper R; MacDonald G
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 25344347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Facial and self-report questionnaire measures capture different aspects of romantic partner preferences.
    South Palomares JK; Young AW
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):549-575. PubMed ID: 30270430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices.
    Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Watkins CD; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Aug; 8(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 22947812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Same-sex gaze attraction influences mate-choice copying in humans.
    Yorzinski JL; Platt ML
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9115. PubMed ID: 20161739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sex differences in relationship regret: the role of perceived mate characteristics.
    Coats S; Harrington JT; Beaubouef M; Locke H
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Jul; 10(3):422-42. PubMed ID: 22947670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society.
    Buston PM; Emlen ST
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Jul; 100(15):8805-10. PubMed ID: 12843405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mate choice trade-offs and women's preference for physically attractive men.
    Waynforth D
    Hum Nat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 26192277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do women's preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle?
    Jünger J; Motta-Mena NV; Cardenas R; Bailey D; Rosenfield KA; Schild C; Penke L; Puts DA
    Horm Behav; 2018 Nov; 106():122-134. PubMed ID: 30342884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mate value asymmetry and relationship satisfaction in female opinion.
    Nowak N; Danel D
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2014; 40(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 23898967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Endorsement of Social and Personal Values Predicts the Desirability of Men and Women as Long-Term Partners.
    Lopes GS; Barbaro N; Sela Y; Jeffery AJ; Pham MN; Shackelford TK; Zeigler-Hill V
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(4):1474704917742384. PubMed ID: 29152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?
    Stulp G; Buunk AP; Pollet TV; Nettle D; Verhulst S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54186. PubMed ID: 23342102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.