147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1782767)
21. Prevalence of positive epicutaneous tests among infants, children, and adolescents.
Weston WL; Weston JA; Kinoshita J; Kloepfer S; Carreon L; Toth S; Bullard D; Harper K; Martinez S
Pediatrics; 1986 Dec; 78(6):1070-4. PubMed ID: 3786031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patch test results in schoolchildren. Results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Brasch J; Geier J
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Dec; 37(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 9455632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicentre patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde.
Isaksson M; Inerot A; Lidén C; Matura M; Stenberg B; Möller H; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Jul; 65(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 21595700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multicenter Patch Testing With a Resol Resin Based on Phenol and Formaldehyde Within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Isaksson M; Ale I; Andersen K; Diepgen T; Elsner P; Goossens A; Goh CL; Jerajani H; Maibach H; Matsunaga K; McFadden J; Nixon R; Sasseville D; Bruze M;
Dermatitis; 2015; 26(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 26367206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America--1984 to 1985.
Storrs FJ; Rosenthal LE; Adams RM; Clendenning W; Emmett EA; Fisher AA; Larsen WG; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Schorr WF
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 20(6):1038-45. PubMed ID: 2754054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine, and benzocaine. Relationships between age, sex, history of exposure, and reactivity to standard patch tests and use tests in a general population.
Prystowsky SD; Allen AM; Smith RW; Nonomura JH; Odom RB; Akers WA
Arch Dermatol; 1979 Aug; 115(8):959-62. PubMed ID: 157103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patch test reactions in atopic patients.
Lammintausta K; Kalimo K; Fagerlund VL
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Apr; 26(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 1395560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pediatric contact dermatitis.
Sharma VK; Asati DP
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2010; 76(5):514-20. PubMed ID: 20826990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contact dermatitis to neomycin with false negative patch tests: allergy established by intradermal and usage tests.
Epstein E
Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):219-20. PubMed ID: 7389336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Akasya-Hillenbrand E; Ozkaya-Bayazit E
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jan; 46(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11918582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Test results in 1008 patients with contact allergy].
Lämmer D
Z Hautkr; 1979 Jun; 54(12):571-9. PubMed ID: 463180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Contact hypersensitivity in adolescents.
Pap EB; Temesvári E; Németh I; Sárdy M; Pónyai G
Pediatr Dermatol; 2018 Nov; 35(6):769-773. PubMed ID: 30152547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pediatric Contact Dermatitis Registry Inaugural Case Data.
Goldenberg A; Mousdicas N; Silverberg N; Powell D; Pelletier JL; Silverberg JI; Zippin J; Fonacier L; Tosti A; Lawley L; Wu Chang M; Scheman A; Kleiner G; Williams J; Watsky K; Dunnick CA; Frederickson R; Matiz C; Chaney K; Estes TS; Botto N; Draper M; Kircik L; Lugo-Somolinos A; Machler B; Jacob SE
Dermatitis; 2016; 27(5):293-302. PubMed ID: 27649353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patch testing in children (II). Results and case reports.
Pevny I; Brennenstuhl M; Razinskas G
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):302-10. PubMed ID: 6525825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contact sensitivity in adults with atopic dermatitis in childhood.
Rystedt I
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Jul; 13(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 4042640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multicentre patch testing with fragrance mix II and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Isaksson M; Inerot A; Lidén C; Lindberg M; Matura M; Möller H; Stenberg B; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Mar; 70(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 24588374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children - a review of current data.
Simonsen AB; Deleuran M; Johansen JD; Sommerlund M
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Nov; 65(5):254-65. PubMed ID: 21851361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
