183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17828460)
1. An automated algorithm to detect the trabecular-cortical bone interface in micro-computed tomographic images.
Lublinsky S; Ozcivici E; Judex S
Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Oct; 81(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 17828460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stereological measures of trabecular bone structure: comparison of 3D micro computed tomography with 2D histological sections in human proximal tibial bone biopsies.
Thomsen JS; Laib A; Koller B; Prohaska S; Mosekilde L; Gowin W
J Microsc; 2005 May; 218(Pt 2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15857378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic segmentation of cortical and trabecular compartments based on a dual threshold technique for in vivo micro-CT bone analysis.
Buie HR; Campbell GM; Klinck RJ; MacNeil JA; Boyd SK
Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):505-15. PubMed ID: 17693147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new method of segmentation of compact-appearing, transitional and trabecular compartments and quantification of cortical porosity from high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic images.
Zebaze R; Ghasem-Zadeh A; Mbala A; Seeman E
Bone; 2013 May; 54(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 23334082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated compartmental analysis for high-throughput skeletal phenotyping in femora of genetic mouse models.
Kohler T; Stauber M; Donahue LR; Müller R
Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):659-67. PubMed ID: 17662679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data.
Kang Y; Engelke K; Kalender WA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 May; 22(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 12846428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ground sections, paraffin sections and micro-CT imaging of bone from the epiphysis of the porcine femur for morphometric evaluation.
Kubíková T; Bartoš M; Juhas Š; Suchý T; Sauerová P; Hubálek-Kalbáčová M; Tonar Z
Ann Anat; 2018 Nov; 220():85-96. PubMed ID: 30092281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of vertebral and femoral trabecular morphology and stiffness using a flat-panel C-arm-based CT approach.
Mulder L; van Rietbergen B; Noordhoek NJ; Ito K
Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):200-8. PubMed ID: 22057082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wavelet-based characterization of vertebral trabecular bone structure from magnetic resonance images at 3 T compared with micro-computed tomographic measurements.
Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Burghardt AJ; Haase S; Sedat JW; Moss WC; Majumdar S
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(3):392-8. PubMed ID: 17371730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Micro-tomographic imaging for the nondestructive evaluation of trabecular bone architecture.
Müller R; Rüegsegger P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 40():61-79. PubMed ID: 10168883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography.
Bouxsein ML; Boyd SK; Christiansen BA; Guldberg RE; Jepsen KJ; Müller R
J Bone Miner Res; 2010 Jul; 25(7):1468-86. PubMed ID: 20533309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of bone micro-architecture measurements in rodents by in vivo micro-computed tomography is maximized with three-dimensional image registration.
Nishiyama KK; Campbell GM; Klinck RJ; Boyd SK
Bone; 2010 Jan; 46(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 19796719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Segmentation techniques for analysis of bone by three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging.
Dufresne T
Technol Health Care; 1998 Dec; 6(5-6):351-9. PubMed ID: 10100938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethanol bone evaluation using 3D microtomography.
Lima I; Rocha MS; Lopes RT
Micron; 2008 Jul; 39(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 17485216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gender specific LRP5 influences on trabecular bone structure and strength.
Dubrow SA; Hruby PM; Akhter MP
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2007; 7(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 17627087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of trabecular bone thickness in the limited resolution regime of in vivo MRI by fuzzy distance transform.
Saha PK; Wehrli FW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jan; 23(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 14719687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new high-resolution computed tomography (CT) segmentation method for trabecular bone architectural analysis.
Scherf H; Tilgner R
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Sep; 140(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 19280676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in human long bones: evaluation of in vitro and in vivo precision.
Sievänen H; Koskue V; Rauhio A; Kannus P; Heinonen A; Vuori I
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 May; 13(5):871-82. PubMed ID: 9610752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compartmental bone morphometry in the mouse femur: reproducibility and resolution dependence of microtomographic measurements.
Kohler T; Beyeler M; Webster D; Müller R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Nov; 77(5):281-90. PubMed ID: 16283571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo micro-CT scanning of a rabbit distal femur: repeatability and reproducibility.
Voor MJ; Yang S; Burden RL; Waddell SW
J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):186-93. PubMed ID: 17716676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
