250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17828549)
1. Investigation of the radiation risk due to environmental contamination by 241Am from lightning rods disposed at uncontrolled garbage dumps.
Marumo JT; Isiki VL; Miyamoto H; Ferreira RV; Bellini MH; de Lima LF
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2008 Feb; 47(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 17828549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experience in the management of disused lightning rods containing 241Am in a research institute in Brazil.
Vicente R; Potiens A; Sakata S; Dellamano J
Health Phys; 2013 Nov; 105(5 Suppl 3):S223-30. PubMed ID: 24077081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental levels of radioactivity at Atomic Energy Commission installations. 1. Hanford Atomic Products Operation, January-December 1970.
Radiat Data Rep; 1974 Apr; 15(4):203-25. PubMed ID: 4856842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A radiological incident with a radioactive lightning rod source found in a vehicle used by film crewmembers: a case study.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Kovacevic M; Kosutic D; Arandjic D; Lazarevic D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Oct; 141(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 20639515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calculations of environmental radiation exposures and population doses due to effluents from a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant.
Martin JA
Radiat Data Rep; 1973 Feb; 14(2):59-76. PubMed ID: 4734816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental levels of radioactivity at Atomic Energy Commission installations. 1. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, calendar year 1972. 2. Mound Laboratory, January-December 1972.
Radiat Data Rep; 1974 Dec; 15(12):818-41. PubMed ID: 4479996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental radiation effects of nuclear facilities in New York State.
Terpilak MS; Jorgensen BL
Radiat Data Rep; 1974 Jul; 15(7):375-400. PubMed ID: 4859316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Radionuclide concentrations in raw and purified phosphoric acids from Brazil and their processing wastes: implications for radiation exposures.
da Conceição FT; Antunes ML; Durrant SF
Environ Geochem Health; 2012 Feb; 34(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 21614483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation release at the nation's only operating deep geological repository--an independent monitoring perspective.
Thakur P; Ballard S; Hardy R
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(21):12698-705. PubMed ID: 25313463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiological health data. IV. Other data. Environmental levels of radioactivity at Atomic Energy Commission installations.
Radiol Health Data Rep; 1971 Aug; 12(8):427-38. PubMed ID: 5109807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ongoing environmental monitoring and assessment of the long-term impacts of the February 2014 radiological release from the waste isolation pilot plant.
Thakur P; Runyon T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(17):17038-17049. PubMed ID: 29633192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental levels of radioactivity at Atomic Energy Commission installations.
Radiat Data Rep; 1973 Oct; 14(10):624-50. PubMed ID: 4800664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental levels of radioactivity at Atomic Energy Commission installations. 1. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, January-December 1972. 2. National Reactor Testing Station, January-December 1972.
Radiat Data Rep; 1974 Nov; 15(11):723-55. PubMed ID: 4479903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental levels of radioactivity at Atomic Energy Commission installations. 1. Brookhaven National Laboratory, January-December 1971. 2. Oak Ridge area. January-December 1971. 3. Pinellas Peninsula Plant, July-December 1971.
Radiat Data Rep; 1974 Jul; 15(7):450-74. PubMed ID: 4859315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The combined impact on doses to man of multiple, authorized, radionuclide discharges for the year 1999 reaching the upper river thames, uk.
Hilton J; Harvey M; Simmonds J
Health Phys; 2004 Jul; 87(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 15194920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remediation of Hanford's N-reactor liquid waste disposal sites.
Sitsler RB; DeMers SK
Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S41-6. PubMed ID: 12564346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiological impact on the workers, members of the public, and environment from the partial decommissioning of Pakistan Research Reactor-I and its associated radioactive residues.
Ali A; Orfi SD; Manzur H; Aslam M
Health Phys; 2001 May; 80(5 Suppl):S89-91. PubMed ID: 11316090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Source term estimation and the isotopic ratio of radioactive material released from the WIPP repository in New Mexico, USA.
Thakur P
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 1():193-203. PubMed ID: 26492395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental and health impacts of February 14, 2014 radiation release from the nation's only deep geologic nuclear waste repository.
Thakur P; Lemons BG; Ballard S; Hardy R
J Environ Radioact; 2015 Aug; 146():6-15. PubMed ID: 25880461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
