BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17828625)

  • 1. Age differences in the distractor-ratio effect as a function of contrast level.
    White C; Wheatley D; Konwisorz O; Scialfa CT
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Sep; 14(5):487-504. PubMed ID: 17828625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging and comparative search for feature differences.
    Gottlob LR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):435-57. PubMed ID: 16887782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frontal-parietal synchrony in elderly EEG for visual search.
    Phillips S; Takeda Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 19903501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Background, an important factor in visual search.
    De Vries JP; Hooge IT; Wertheim AH; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():128-38. PubMed ID: 23623804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of target and distractor contrast on the remote distractor effect.
    Born S; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2805-16. PubMed ID: 18831984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age differences in what is viewed and remembered in complex conjunction search.
    Williams CC; Zacks RT; Henderson JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):946-66. PubMed ID: 18932061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New insights into feature and conjunction search: I. Evidence from pupil size, eye movements and ageing.
    Porter G; Tales A; Troscianko T; Wilcock G; Haworth J; Leonards U
    Cortex; 2010 May; 46(5):621-36. PubMed ID: 19591979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual search for change in older adults.
    Veiel LL; Storandt M; Abrams RA
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Dec; 21(4):754-62. PubMed ID: 17201495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search.
    Telling AL; Kumar S; Meyer AS; Humphreys GW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2212-25. PubMed ID: 19803680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guidance of eye movements during visual conjunction search: local and global contextual effects on target discriminability.
    Shen K; Paré M
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 95(5):2845-55. PubMed ID: 16467428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related differences in the use of background layout in visual search.
    Becic E; Kramer AF; Boot WR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Mar; 14(2):109-25. PubMed ID: 17364375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.