These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1783225)

  • 1. The amplitude modulation-following response as an audiometric tool.
    Griffiths SK; Chambers RD
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 1783225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults using the AMFR.
    Chambers RD; Meyer TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jan; 4(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 8422480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Amplitude modulation following response (AMFR)--a method for objective frequency specific audiologic diagnosis].
    Pethe J; Begall K; Mühler R; Lottmann JK
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 8851115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.
    Kuwada S; Batra R; Maher VL
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3700256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hauser R; Probst R; Löhle E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1991; 248(6):345-52. PubMed ID: 1930984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of aging on amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Furuse H; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():15-22. PubMed ID: 8203219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating audiometric thresholds using simultaneous acquisition of ASSR and ABR from QASSR in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lachowska M; Bohórquez J; Özdamar Ö; Niemczyk K
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):748-757. PubMed ID: 27686167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detectability of amplitude-modulation following response at different carrier frequencies.
    Aoyagi M; Furuse H; Yokota M; Kiren T; Suzuki Y; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():23-7. PubMed ID: 8203237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Objective audiometry using amplitude-modulation following responses elicited by compound sinusoidal amplitude-modulated tones].
    Ohtake Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2003 Oct; 106(10):1045-54. PubMed ID: 14631772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency specificity of amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase spectral analysis.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Kim Y; Suzuki Y; Fuse T; Koike Y
    Audiology; 1993; 32(5):293-301. PubMed ID: 8216028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Furuse H; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():7-14. PubMed ID: 8203246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 40-Hz potential and SN10 as measures of low-frequency thresholds.
    Fowler CG; Swanson MR
    Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 2749172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating Hearing Thresholds in Hearing-Impaired Adults through Objective Detection of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    Van Dun B; Dillon H; Seeto M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):370-83. PubMed ID: 25879241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram.
    Gorga MP; Worthington DW; Reiland JK; Beauchaine KA; Goldgar DE
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 3996784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tone-on-tone masking in subjects with normal hearing and with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Chung DY
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Dec; 24(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 7329047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence.
    Aoyagi M; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Furuse H; Watanabe T; Ito T
    Audiol Neurootol; 1999; 4(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 9873150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threshold prediction from the auditory 40-Hz evoked potential.
    Lynn JM; Lesner SA; Sandridge SA; Daddario CC
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 6510584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.