These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17835525)

  • 1. Charlie Cantor Gets Kicked Upstairs: Amid charges of absenteeism and scientific inefficiency, the head of DOE's Lawrence Berkeley human genome lab departs.
    Selvin P
    Science; 1990 Sep; 249(4974):1238-9. PubMed ID: 17835525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing roles in healthcare. It gets kicked upstairs.
    Passiment M
    MD Comput; 1999; 16(5):50-1. PubMed ID: 10570610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intestinal "normalization" of germ-free rabbits with rabbit caecal microflora: effect of dosing regimens.
    Boot R; Koopman JP; Lankhorst A; Stadhouders AM; Welling GW; Hectors MP
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1989; 32(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 2756799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nuclear Squeeze at Lawrence Berkeley Lab: High-energy collisions at the Bevalac between niobium nuclei yield the first direct evidence that nuclear matter can be compressed.
    Robinson AL
    Science; 1984 May; 224(4651):857-8. PubMed ID: 17743187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. John Doe's dilemma: legal resistance to psychosurgery.
    Washington JE
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1973; 5(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 11663418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DOE's Guide to Weapons Plant Spills.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4885):1500-1. PubMed ID: 17788414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How Geography Boosted DOE's Budget.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1990 Nov; 250(4981):618. PubMed ID: 17810851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal Trouble for DOE's Reactors.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1988 Oct; 242(4878):508. PubMed ID: 17815885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DOE's Mixed Forecast.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1983 May; 220(4599):800. PubMed ID: 17834159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy. DOE's push to train a new generation falters in House.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5937):130-1. PubMed ID: 19589968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy research. DOE's disappointing budget makes it harder to stick to the basics.
    Cho A
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5863):554-5. PubMed ID: 18239093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Employment entrance exam; genetic/medical tests; applicants' consent; statute of limitations: Norman-Bloodsaw v. Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1998; 22(2):233. PubMed ID: 11645062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The DOE's role in isotope production.
    O'Leary HR
    J Nucl Med; 1995 Jun; 36(6):30N, 33N. PubMed ID: 7769443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Baby Doe's legal fate.
    Salholz E
    Newsweek; 1983 Nov; 102(20):84. PubMed ID: 10263112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Savannah River Blues: DOE's new safety team runs into bureaucratic obstacles and an assumption among operators that "reactors are safe unless demonstrated otherwise".
    Marshall E
    Science; 1988 Oct; 242(4877):363-5. PubMed ID: 17789801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DOE's energy performance standards: the debate intensifies.
    Archit Rec; 1980 Mar; 167(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 10246053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Universities Denounce DOE's Secrecy Rules: They are joined by a broad array of critics in claiming that proposed regulations infringe academic freedom and citizens' rights.
    Norman C
    Science; 1983 Sep; 221(4614):932-3. PubMed ID: 17748447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Lasagna process" field success increases DOE's interest.
    Shannon D
    Environ Sci Technol; 1995 Oct; 29(10):452A. PubMed ID: 22667237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DOE's plan for A-bomb studies incites anger in Japan.
    Kotz D
    J Nucl Med; 1995 May; 36(5):13N, 26N. PubMed ID: 7738637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.