These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1783873)

  • 1. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health.
    Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Wong YC; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal perception of sound provoked fetal movement for antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Chittacharoen A; Herabutya Y; Tungsagonwattana S; Suthutvoravut S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Dec; 23(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 9433045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of current antepartum fetal tests.
    Tannirandorn Y; Uerpairojkit B; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jan; 78(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 7622974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Kittipibul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The startle test revisited.
    Miller JM; Rodriguez A; Gabert HA
    J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 24(7):421-2. PubMed ID: 15152272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement in the early intrapartum period.
    Chittacharoen A; Srijhantuik K; Suthutvoravut S; Herabutya Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Feb; 56(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 9061386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring.
    Batcha TM; Goonewardene IM
    Ceylon Med J; 2005 Dec; 50(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 16538910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective evaluation of the contraction stress and nonstress tests in the management of post-term pregnancy.
    Druzin ML; Karver ML; Wagner W; Hutson JM; Waltner A; Kogut E
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Jun; 174(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 1595028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the acoustic stimulation test with nonstress test. A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Tongsong T; Piyamongkol W
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 8169910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movements as a measure of fetal well-being.
    Westgren M; Almstrom H; Nyman M; Ulmsten U
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Jun; 94(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 3620400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal acoustic stimulation for rapid intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Wacharaprechanont T; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Nov; 76(11):606-12. PubMed ID: 7964235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of fetal well-being using the nonstress test in the home setting.
    Naef RW; Morrison JC; Washburne JF; McLaughlin BN; Perry KG; Roberts WE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):424-6. PubMed ID: 8058242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the auscultated acceleration test and the nonstress test as predictors of perinatal outcomes.
    Paine LL; Benedict MI; Strobino DM; Gegor CL; Larson EL
    Nurs Res; 1992; 41(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 1549525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie TA; de Jager M; da Ponte A
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical evaluation of antepartum vibratory acoustic stimulation test].
    Chen BJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Mar; 26(2):71-4, 123. PubMed ID: 1860368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The prognostic value of the acoustic stimulation test for fetal wellbeing and neonatal status. Controlled acoustic stimulation of the fetus in the last pregnancy trimester].
    Stelzer E; Dederichs M; Wolff F
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1990; 194(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 2378142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal and ultrasound measurements of elicited fetal movements: a methodologic consideration.
    Kisilevsky BS; Killen H; Muir DW; Low JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):889-92. PubMed ID: 2030863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.