These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17844971)

  • 1. Differences in attentional involvement underlying the perception of distinctive and typical faces.
    Ryu JJ; Chaudhuri A
    Perception; 2007; 36(7):1057-65. PubMed ID: 17844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.
    Landau AN; Bentin S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):818-30. PubMed ID: 18665728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The duration of the attentional blink in natural scenes depends on stimulus category.
    Einhäuser W; Koch C; Makeig S
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):597-607. PubMed ID: 17275058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional blink deficits observed in dyslexia depend on task demands.
    Buchholz J; Aimola Davies A
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1292-302. PubMed ID: 17408718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similarity determines the attentional blink.
    Raymond JE; Shapiro KL; Arnell KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):653-62. PubMed ID: 7790839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink?
    Raymond JE; Shapiro KL; Arnell KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 1500880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of tobacco deprivation on the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Heinz A; Waters AJ; Taylor RC; Myers CS; Moolchan ET; Heishman SJ
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2007 Mar; 22(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17266171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional modulation of early ERP components in response to faces: evidence from the attentional blink paradigm.
    Darque A; Del Zotto M; Khateb A; Pegna AJ
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Apr; 25(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 21858700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Cartesian reflex assessment of face processing.
    Polewan RJ; Vigorito CM; Nason CD; Block RA; Moore JW
    Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev; 2006 Mar; 5(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 16816090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ignoring real faces: effects of valence, threat, and salience.
    Blagrove E; Watson DG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):725-45. PubMed ID: 24435898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional blinks as errors in temporal binding.
    Popple AV; Levi DM
    Vision Res; 2007 Oct; 47(23):2973-81. PubMed ID: 17888482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An electrophysiological investigation of attentional blink in schizophrenia: separating perceptual and attentional processes.
    Mathis KI; Wynn JK; Jahshan C; Hellemann G; Darque A; Green MF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Oct; 86(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 22771850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.
    Loffler G; Gordon GE; Wilkinson F; Goren D; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2287-97. PubMed ID: 15924942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early detection and avoidance of threatening faces during passive viewing.
    Becker MW; Detweiler-Bedell B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1257-64. PubMed ID: 19283559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The meaning of the mask matters: evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink.
    Dux PE; Coltheart V
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):775-9. PubMed ID: 16181439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High familiarity enhances visual change detection for face stimuli.
    Buttle H; Raymond JE
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1296-306. PubMed ID: 14710963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study.
    Trenner MU; Schweinberger SR; Jentzsch I; Sommer W
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):388-400. PubMed ID: 15511654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets.
    Thompson C; Underwood G; Crundall D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 17853197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.