These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17845092)

  • 1. Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact.
    De Corte W; Lievens F; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1380-93. PubMed ID: 17845092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multistage selection strategies: simulating the effects on adverse impact and expected performance for various predictor combinations.
    Finch DM; Edwards BD; Wallace JC
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):318-40. PubMed ID: 19271793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designing Pareto-optimal selection systems: formalizing the decisions required for selection system development.
    De Corte W; Sackett PR; Lievens F
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):907-26. PubMed ID: 21463016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing the best method for local validity estimation: relative accuracy of meta-analysis versus a local study versus Bayes-analysis.
    Newman DA; Jacobs RR; Bartram D
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1394-413. PubMed ID: 17845093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting adverse impact and mean criterion performance in multistage selection.
    De Corte W; Lievens F; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):523-37. PubMed ID: 16737352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trade-offs and spatial life-history strategies in classical metapopulations.
    Crowley PH; McLetchie DN
    Am Nat; 2002 Feb; 159(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 18707413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for adverse impact when sample size is small.
    Collins MW; Morris SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18361646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques.
    Ottosson RO; Engstrom PE; Sjöström D; Behrens CF; Karlsson A; Knöös T; Ceberg C
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 18752085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of trade-offs between sexual and asexual phases and the role of reproductive plasticity in the genetic architecture of aphid life histories.
    Nespolo RF; Halkett F; Figueroa CC; Plantegenest M; Simon JC
    Evolution; 2009 Sep; 63(9):2402-12. PubMed ID: 19473379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):613-21. PubMed ID: 16737358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The lack of theoretical support for using person trade-offs in QALY-type models.
    Østerdal LP
    Eur J Health Econ; 2009 Oct; 10(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 19340469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictor combination in binary decision-making situations.
    McGrath RE
    Psychol Assess; 2008 Sep; 20(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 18778156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of optimal cutoff points for single and multiple tests in personnel selection.
    Ben-Yashar R; Nitzan S; Vos HJ
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):652-60. PubMed ID: 17296100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice.
    Arthur W; Villado AJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):435-42. PubMed ID: 18361642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection.
    Rhomberg LR; Baetcke K; Blancato J; Bus J; Cohen S; Conolly R; Dixit R; Doe J; Ekelman K; Fenner-Crisp P; Harvey P; Hattis D; Jacobs A; Jacobson-Kram D; Lewandowski T; Liteplo R; Pelkonen O; Rice J; Somers D; Turturro A; West W; Olin S
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(9):729-837. PubMed ID: 17957539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personnel selection.
    Sackett PR; Lievens F
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2008; 59():419-50. PubMed ID: 17854285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analyzing the main trade-offs in multiobjective radiation therapy treatment planning databases.
    Spalke T; Craft D; Bortfeld T
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3741-54. PubMed ID: 19478382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adverse impact reduction and job performance optimization via pareto-optimal weighting: A shrinkage formula and regularization technique using machine learning.
    Song QC; Tang C; Newman DA; Wee S
    J Appl Psychol; 2023 Sep; 108(9):1461-1485. PubMed ID: 37036691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.