These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1784533)

  • 1. Root surface marginal microleakage of composites: comparison of Cavosurface finishes.
    Litkowski LJ; Swierczewski M
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 1784533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal leakage and marginal gap dimensions of three dentinal bonding systems.
    Rigsby DF; Retief DH; Russell CM; Denys FR
    Am J Dent; 1990 Dec; 3(6):289-94. PubMed ID: 2128913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro microleakage of dentin adhesives.
    Sorensen JA; Dixit NV; White SN; Avera SP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 1725698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of three dentinal bonding systems: a 6-month evaluation.
    Crim GA
    Quintessence Int; 1991 May; 22(5):387-9. PubMed ID: 1924692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage with Gluma: effects of unfilled resin polymerization and storage time.
    Hansen SE; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1989 Oct; 2(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 2517873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentine bonding agents--optimizing the use of composite materials.
    Burke FJ
    Dent Update; 1991 Apr; 18(3):96, 98-102, 104. PubMed ID: 2129483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glutaraldehyde-methacrylate dentine adhesive: the relationship between cavity site and marginal contraction gaps.
    Soh G; Henderson LJ; Chantler P
    Singapore Dent J; 1988 Dec; 13(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 3155334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage and marginal placement of a glass-ionomer liner.
    Holtan JR; Nystrom GP; Douglas WH; Phelps RA
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Feb; 21(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 2197659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
    Wibowo G; Stockton L
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
    Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin.
    Owens BM; Halter TK; Brown DM
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 9728146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
    Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.