200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17845464)
1. Potentiality and human embryos.
Lizza JP
Bioethics; 2007 Sep; 21(7):379-85. PubMed ID: 17845464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Research on human embryos--a justification.
Brown J
J Med Ethics; 1986 Dec; 12(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 3806632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preembryo Personhood: an assessment of the President's Council arguments.
Strong C
Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(5):433-53. PubMed ID: 17043924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When does potentiality count? A comment on Lockwood.
Hare RM
Bioethics; 1988 Jul; 2(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 11659015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Embryos, individuals, and persons: an argument against embryo creation and research.
Tollefsen C
J Appl Philos; 2001; 18(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 14582501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On potentiality and respect for embryos: a reply to Mary Mahowald.
Gómez-Lobo A
Theor Med Bioeth; 2005; 26(2):105-10; discussion 111-3. PubMed ID: 15971893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confronting deep moral disagreement: the President's Council on Bioethics, moral status, and human embryos.
Nelson LJ; Meyer MJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):33-42. PubMed ID: 16282112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The argument from potentiality in the embryo protection debate: finally "depotentialized"?
Stier M; Schoene-Seifert B
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23311835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does potentiality have a use in bioethics?
Marquis D
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 23311838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Embryos, the principle of proportionality, and the shaky ground of moral respect.
Pugh J
Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):420-6. PubMed ID: 23445499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Other selves": moral and legal proposals regarding the personhood of cryopreserved human embryos.
Brugger EC
Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(2):105-29. PubMed ID: 19253031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why current UK legislation on embryo research is immoral. How the argument from lack of qualities and the argument from potentiality have been applied and why they should be rejected.
Deckers J
Bioethics; 2005 Jun; 19(3):251-71. PubMed ID: 16167404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potentiality arguments and the definition of "human organism".
Dufner A
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 23311839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "More on respect for embryos and potentiality: does respect for embryos entail respect for in vitro embryos?".
Hanson SS
Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 16909335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. We are not Gametes: Distinguishing between Abortion and Contraception.
Saad T
New Bioeth; 2016 Nov; 22(3):202-211. PubMed ID: 28219264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cognitive psychology of the potentiality argument.
Frias L; Struchiner N
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 23311841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The legal status of the embryo in comparative perspective.
Eser A
Med Law; 1992; 11(7-8):579-90. PubMed ID: 1302775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Moral status, human identity, and early embryos: a critique of the President's approach.
DeGrazia D
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(1):49-57, 4. PubMed ID: 16489984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The embryo potentiality argument revisited: "Once more unto the breach, dear friends".
Hyun I
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 23311836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The moral status of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants.
Strong C
J Med Philos; 1997 Oct; 22(5):457-78. PubMed ID: 9360198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
