BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17845518)

  • 1. Combining ontogenetic and evolutionary scales of morphological disparity: a study of early Jurassic ammonites.
    Gerber S; Neige P; Eble GJ
    Evol Dev; 2007; 9(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 17845518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Allometric space and allometric disparity: a developmental perspective in the macroevolutionary analysis of morphological disparity.
    Gerber S; Eble GJ; Neige P
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1450-7. PubMed ID: 18346223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphomechanics and Developmental Constraints in the Evolution of Ammonites Shell Form.
    Erlich A; Moulton DE; Goriely A; Chirat R
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2016 Nov; 326(7):437-450. PubMed ID: 27921363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ontogenetic drivers of morphological evolution in monitor lizards and allies (Squamata: Paleoanguimorpha), a clade with extreme body size disparity.
    Pavón-Vázquez CJ; Esquerré D; Keogh JS
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35151266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinematics of cranial ontogeny: heterotopy, heterochrony, and geometric morphometric analysis of growth models.
    Zollikofer CP; Ponce de León MS
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2004 May; 302(3):322-40. PubMed ID: 15211689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do different disparity proxies converge on a common signal? Insights from the cranial morphometrics and evolutionary history of Pterosauria (Diapsida: Archosauria).
    Foth C; Brusatte SL; Butler RJ
    J Evol Biol; 2012 May; 25(5):904-15. PubMed ID: 22356676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolutionary origins of novel conchologic growth patterns in tropical American corbulid bivalves.
    Goodwin DH; Anderson LC; Roopnarine PD
    Evol Dev; 2008; 10(5):642-56. PubMed ID: 18803781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolutionary patterns in ontogenetic transformation: from laws to regularities.
    Alberch P; Blanco MJ
    Int J Dev Biol; 1996 Aug; 40(4):845-58. PubMed ID: 8877459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bathymetric patterns of morphological disparity in deep-sea gastropods from the western North Atlantic basin.
    McClain CR
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1492-9. PubMed ID: 16153034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of leaf form in marsileaceous ferns: evidence for heterochrony.
    Pryer KM; Hearn DJ
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):498-513. PubMed ID: 19154361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of ontogenetic allometry in ammonoids.
    Korn D
    Evol Dev; 2012; 14(6):501-14. PubMed ID: 23134208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tempo and mode of evolutionary radiation in iguanian lizards.
    Harmon LJ; Schulte JA; Larson A; Losos JB
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):961-4. PubMed ID: 12920297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphological evolution of the lizard skull: a geometric morphometrics survey.
    Stayton CT
    J Morphol; 2005 Jan; 263(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 15536647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequence heterochrony and the evolution of development.
    Smith KK
    J Morphol; 2002 Apr; 252(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 11921037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The shape of pterosaur evolution: evidence from the fossil record.
    Dyke GJ; McGowan AJ; Nudds RL; Smith D
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):890-8. PubMed ID: 19210587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why does pollen morphology vary? Evolutionary dynamics and morphospace occupation in the largest angiosperm order (Asterales).
    Jardine PE; Palazzesi L; Tellería MC; Barreda VD
    New Phytol; 2022 May; 234(3):1075-1087. PubMed ID: 35147224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes.
    Mitteroecker P; Gunz P; Bookstein FL
    Evol Dev; 2005; 7(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 15876197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Hyperbolic growth of marine and continental biodiversity through the phanerozoic and community evolution].
    Markov AV; Korotaev AV
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2008; 69(3):175-94. PubMed ID: 18677962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of cranial ontogeny in lacertid lizards: morphological and allometric disparity.
    Urošević A; Ljubisavljević K; Ivanović A
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):399-415. PubMed ID: 23278889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Growth trajectories in the cave bear and its extant relatives: an examination of ontogenetic patterns in phylogeny.
    Fuchs M; Geiger M; Stange M; Sánchez-Villagra MR
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Nov; 15():239. PubMed ID: 26525575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.