BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17845809)

  • 1. Clinical relevance of pressure-dependent scattering at low acoustic pressures.
    Emmer M; Vos HJ; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasonics; 2007 Dec; 47(1-4):74-7. PubMed ID: 17845809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures.
    Emmer M; Vos HJ; Goertz DE; van Wamel A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 18829153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The onset of microbubble vibration.
    Emmer M; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):941-9. PubMed ID: 17451868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement of subharmonic emission from encapsulated microbubbles by using a chirp excitation technique.
    Zhang D; Gong Y; Gong X; Liu Z; Tan K; Zheng H
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5531-44. PubMed ID: 17804880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual high-frequency difference excitation for contrast detection.
    Yeh CK; Su SY; Shen CC; Li ML
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2164-76. PubMed ID: 18986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pulse subtraction time delay imaging method for ultrasound contrast agent detection.
    Borsboom JM; Bouakaz A; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1151-8. PubMed ID: 19574123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
    Faez T; Renaud G; Defontaine M; Calle S; de Jong N
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6459-73. PubMed ID: 21934190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging.
    Crocco M; Palmese M; Sciallero C; Trucco A
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Jan; 49(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 18703210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Dollet B; van der Meer SM; Garbin V; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1465-73. PubMed ID: 18450362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High frequency attenuation measurements of lipid encapsulated contrast agents.
    Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; Voormolen MM; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e131-4. PubMed ID: 16843511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study on the multiple scattering effects of ultrasound contrast agents.
    Chen J; Zhu Z
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e115-8. PubMed ID: 16854444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Sijl J; Gaud E; Frinking PJ; Arditi M; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):4091-7. PubMed ID: 19206831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of nonlinear propagation in ultrasound contrast agent imaging.
    Tang MX; Kamiyama N; Eckersley RJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 36(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 20133035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vibration mode imaging.
    Zhang X; Zeraati M; Kinnick RR; Greenleaf JF; Fatemi M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):843-52. PubMed ID: 17679335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radial modulation imaging of microbubble contrast agents at high frequency.
    Chérin E; Brown J; Måsøy SE; Shariff H; Karshafian R; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 34(6):949-62. PubMed ID: 18294758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Sijl J; Dollet B; Overvelde M; Garbin V; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3239-52. PubMed ID: 21110619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI.
    Lampaskis M; Averkiou M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 20045592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for differentiating targeted microbubbles in real time using subharmonic micro-ultrasound and interframe filtering.
    Needles A; Couture O; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1564-73. PubMed ID: 19632763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ultrasonic microbubble semi-intermodulated imaging technique.
    Wu CY; Tsao J; Chou YH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1199-210. PubMed ID: 16176787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Difference frequency and its harmonic emitted by microbubbles under dual frequency excitation.
    Chen S; Kinnick R; Greenleaf JF; Fatemi M
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e123-6. PubMed ID: 16930662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.