These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1784667)

  • 1. Convergent and discriminant validity of FIRO-B questionnaire.
    Salminen S
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Dec; 69(3 Pt 1):787-90. PubMed ID: 1784667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Kramer-Froehle controversy: a contribution to construct validity of the FIRO-B questionnaire.
    Gluck GA
    J Pers Assess; 1979 Oct; 43(5):541-3. PubMed ID: 16367032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FIRO-B: factors and facets.
    Macrosson WD
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Feb; 86(1):311-20. PubMed ID: 10778286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does FIRO-B relate better to interpersonal or intrapersonal behavior?
    Hurley JR
    J Clin Psychol; 1990 Jul; 46(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 2212049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FIRO-B: the power of love and the love of power.
    Fisher SG; Macrosson WD; Walker CA
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Feb; 76(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 7770568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].
    Gosselin P; Dugas MJ; Ladouceur R; Freeston MH
    Encephale; 2001; 27(5):475-84. PubMed ID: 11760697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic validity of ICD-10 personality dimensions: a multitrait-multimethod analysis of two self-report questionnaires and a structured interview.
    Schroeder K; Andresen B; Naber D; Huber CG
    Psychopathology; 2010; 43(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 20110763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consensual validity parameters of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire: evidence from self-reports and spouse reports.
    Gomà-i-Freixanet M; Wismeijer AA; Valero S
    J Pers Assess; 2005 Jun; 84(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 15907164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct validity for self-acceptance and fear of negative evaluation.
    Durm MW; Glaze PE
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):386. PubMed ID: 11783567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule from the perspective of the five-factor model.
    Piedmont RL; McCrae RR; Costa PT
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Feb; 58(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 1545345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of the PAI interpersonal scales for measuring the dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex.
    Ansell EB; Kurtz JE; DeMoor RM; Markey PM
    J Pers Assess; 2011 Jan; 93(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 21184328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of the Perceived Criticism Measure in an undergraduate sample.
    White JD; Strong JE; Chambless DL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Aug; 83(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 9775664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between the MBTI and FIRO-B in a large British sample.
    Furnham A; Crump J
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Dec; 101(3 Pt 1):970-8. PubMed ID: 18232456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of convergent and discriminant validity with multitrait-multimethod correlations.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Feb; 64(Pt 1):38-52. PubMed ID: 21506944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Construct validity of the Perceived Criticism Measure.
    Chambless DL; Blake KD
    Behav Ther; 2009 Jun; 40(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19433146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Interaction Anxiousness Scale: construct and criterion-related validity.
    Leary MR; Kowalski RM
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Aug; 61(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 8377098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Narcissism and causal attribution.
    Ladd ER; Welsh MC; Vitulli WF; Labbé EE; Law JG
    Psychol Rep; 1997 Feb; 80(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 9122324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability, validity, and utility of three data modes in assessing marital relationships.
    Boals GF; Peterson DR; Farmer L; Mann DF; Robinson DL
    J Pers Assess; 1982 Feb; 46(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 7069574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: U.S. normative data.
    Cloninger CR; Przybeck TR; Svrakic DM
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Dec; 69(3 Pt 1):1047-57. PubMed ID: 1784653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in the relationship between interpersonal problems and defensive style.
    Bullitt C; Farber BA
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):767-8. PubMed ID: 12530721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.