These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17846675)

  • 21. Factors to consider while treatment planning dental implants in the partially edentulous patient.
    Loos LG; McDonald A
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1997 Dec; 25(12):852-9. PubMed ID: 9534455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Initial implant position determines the magnitude of crestal bone remodeling.
    Hartman GA; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 15152822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Flapless surgery and immediately loaded implants: a retrospective comparison between implantation with and without computer-assisted planned surgical stent.
    Danza M; Carinci F
    Stomatologija; 2010; 12(2):35-41. PubMed ID: 20679754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment.
    Wyatt CC; Pharoah MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):442-52. PubMed ID: 9922736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME; Richardson AC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12498461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results.
    Blanes RJ; Bernard JP; Blanes ZM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 17991252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using the Master Diagnostic Model to enhance restorative success in implant treatment.
    Petrungaro P; Maragos C; Matheson O
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Jan; 21(1):33-40, 42, 44; quiz 46. PubMed ID: 11199688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A system for the diagnosis, placement, and prosthetic restoration of root form implants (U.S. Patent #5,769,636).
    Di Sario F
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Mar; 12(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 12677604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.
    Ganz SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography--a pilot study.
    Almog DM; Onufrak JM; Hebel K; Meitner SW
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8699519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites.
    Silverstein LH; Melkonian RW; Kurtzman D; Garnick JJ; Lefkove MD
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7869413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computer-assisted surgery: double surgical guides for immediate loading of implants in maxillary postextractive sites.
    De Santis D; Malchiodi L; Cucchi A; Canton LC; Trevisiol L; Nocini PF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1781-5. PubMed ID: 21119420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Managing variables in radiographic imaging for implant dentistry.
    Callan DP
    Dent Today; 2006 Jun; 25(6):92-3. PubMed ID: 16792116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed partial dentures in periodontitis-susceptible subjects. A 5-year prospective study.
    Wennström JL; Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K; Karlsson S; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 31(9):713-24. PubMed ID: 15312092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peri-implant bone loss around posterior mandible dental implants placed after distraction osteogenesis: preliminary findings.
    Polo WC; de Araujo NS; Lima YB; Joly JC; Sendyk WR; Cury PR
    J Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 17274707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.