These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17846998)

  • 1. Simultaneously correcting for population stratification and for genotyping error in case-control association studies.
    Cheng KF; Lin WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2007 Oct; 81(4):726-43. PubMed ID: 17846998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting for differential genotyping error in genetic association analysis.
    Yuan M; Fang H; Zhang H
    J Hum Genet; 2013 Oct; 58(10):657-66. PubMed ID: 23863749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple and robust TDT-type test against genotyping error with error rates varying across families.
    Cheng KF; Chen JH
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17476111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.
    Gordon D; Ott J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2001; ():18-29. PubMed ID: 11262939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias correction with a single null marker for population stratification in candidate gene association studies.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 15920341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Gordon D; Finch SJ; Nothnagel M; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 54(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12446984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On a semiparametric test to detect associations between quantitative traits and candidate genes using unrelated individuals.
    Zhang S; Zhu X; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12508255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the joint effect of population stratification and sample selection in studies of gene-gene (environment) interactions.
    Cheng KF; Lee JY
    BMC Genet; 2012 Jan; 13():5. PubMed ID: 22284162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A powerful two-stage association test using case-control and case-parents genotype data.
    Cheng KF; Lin WJ; Chen JH; Horng JT
    Hum Hered; 2009; 68(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiating population stratification from genotyping error using family data.
    Sebro R; Lange C; Laird NM; Rogus JJ; Risch NJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2012 Jan; 76(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 22111716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating individual error rate into association test of unmatched case-control design.
    Hao K; Wang X
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):154-63. PubMed ID: 15812172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. II. False-positive rates and their limiting behavior as number of subpopulations increases.
    Gorroochurn P; Hodge SE; Heiman G; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15604563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust genomic control for association studies.
    Zheng G; Freidlin B; Gastwirth JL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Feb; 78(2):350-6. PubMed ID: 16400614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of population-based association study methods correcting for population stratification.
    Zhang F; Wang Y; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3392. PubMed ID: 18852890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robustness of case-control studies of genetic factors to population stratification: magnitude of bias and type I error.
    Khlat M; Cazes MH; Génin E; Guiguet M
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct; 13(10):1660-4. PubMed ID: 15466984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Mayer-Jochimsen M; Fast S; Tintle NL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56626. PubMed ID: 23472072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. I. Elevation in false positive rates and comparison to confounding risk ratios (a simulation study).
    Heiman GA; Hodge SE; Gorroochurn P; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative semi-parametric test for genetic associations in case-control designs under structured populations.
    Chen HS; Zhu X; Zhao H; Zhang S
    Ann Hum Genet; 2003 May; 67(Pt 3):250-64. PubMed ID: 12914577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attributing Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium to population stratification and genetic association in case-control studies.
    Grover VK; Cole DE; Hamilton DC
    Ann Hum Genet; 2010 Jan; 74(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 19930249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A test of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in structured populations.
    Sha Q; Zhang S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 35(7):671-8. PubMed ID: 21818775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.