BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17847890)

  • 1. Victory for NICE as High Court rejects drugs firm complaints.
    Evans O
    Health Serv J; 2007 Aug; 117(6069):5. PubMed ID: 17847890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NICE stands firm, but the public must learn to respect rationing.
    Mooney H
    Health Serv J; 2007 Aug; 117(6070):12-3. PubMed ID: 17977221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent body calls for a change in drug policies.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e7044. PubMed ID: 23078962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data briefing. The NICE threshold.
    Appleby J
    Health Serv J; 2007 Sep; 117(6074):21. PubMed ID: 17970386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On avoiding a 'last resort'.
    Donald A
    Health Serv J; 2007 Sep; 117(6073):17. PubMed ID: 17972674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Britain to combat conflicts of interest in drug regulators.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7015):263. PubMed ID: 15549064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Triazolam licensing in UK.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1993 Jun; 341(8860):1587. PubMed ID: 8099654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NICE: a nightmare worth having?
    Drummond M
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2007 Apr; 2(Pt 2):203-8; discussion 217-21. PubMed ID: 18634663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novartis challenges India's drug patent laws in Supreme Court.
    Billingsley M
    BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e1279. PubMed ID: 22354594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A response to Birch and Gafni--some reasons to be cheerful about NICE.
    Gold M; Bryan S
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2007 Apr; 2(Pt 2):209-16; discussion 217-21. PubMed ID: 18634664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE).
    Claxton K; Sculpher M; Drummond M
    Lancet; 2002 Aug; 360(9334):711-5. PubMed ID: 12241891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impurities in organic synthetic drugs: a review of regulatory and toxicological considerations.
    Mahoney K; Scales MD; Tucker ML
    Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev; 1993; 12(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 8357945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consultation on rescheduling ketamine.
    Cooper P
    Vet Rec; 2014 Jan; 174(2):52. PubMed ID: 24413300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lethal injection under fire: drug shortages and court challenges are causing lawmakers to review their states' method of execution.
    Widgery A
    State Legis; 2015 May; 41(5):30-1. PubMed ID: 25966509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risky business.
    Ment Health Today; 2005 May; ():12-3. PubMed ID: 15938578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trying times at the FDA--the challenge of ensuring the safety of imported pharmaceuticals.
    Schweitzer SO
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Apr; 358(17):1773-7. PubMed ID: 18434648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The future of off-label marketing regulations in the post-Sorrell era.
    Iraggi J
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2013; 43(3):1137-63. PubMed ID: 23802338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sales of contaminated animal drugs halted.
    Henkel J
    FDA Consum; 1999; 33(5):34. PubMed ID: 10522171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drug patent protection: how long is long enough?
    Sibbald B
    CMAJ; 2001 May; 164(9):1331. PubMed ID: 11341146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drug and alcohol policy at the global level.
    Anderson P
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2006 Nov; 25(6):485-7. PubMed ID: 17132568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.