These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17848026)
1. Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes. Hockley WE; Niewiadomski MW Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):679-88. PubMed ID: 17848026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition. Xu J; Malmberg KJ Mem Cognit; 2007 Apr; 35(3):526-44. PubMed ID: 17691151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect. Criss AH; Aue W; Kılıç A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1910-24. PubMed ID: 24386987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinguishing familiarity from fluency for the compound word pair effect in associative recognition. Ahmad FN; Hockley WE Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1768-1791. PubMed ID: 27415965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Kelley R; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):701-22. PubMed ID: 11394675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Hockley WE Mem Cognit; 1994 Nov; 22(6):713-22. PubMed ID: 7808280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule. Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of familiarity in associative recognition of unitized compound word pairs. Ahmad FN; Hockley WE Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2301-24. PubMed ID: 24873736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intentional and incidental encoding of item and associative information in the directed forgetting procedure. Hockley WE; Ahmad FN; Nicholson R Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 26407851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition. Criss AH; Shiffrin RM Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1284-97. PubMed ID: 15900922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus-based mirror effects in associative recognition revisited. MacMillan MB; Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):178-185. PubMed ID: 35816581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. List discrimination in associative recognition and implications for representation. Criss AH; Shiffrin RM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1199-212. PubMed ID: 16393040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Hockley WE Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1351-9. PubMed ID: 18927048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An abbreviated word recognition protocol based on item difficulty. Hurley RM; Sells JP Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 12677108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall. Clark SE; Burchett RE Mem Cognit; 1994 Jan; 22(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 8035685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory. Bruno D; Higham PA; Perfect TJ Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 19679860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory. Sikström S Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):408-38. PubMed ID: 11700894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory. Morrell HE; Gaitan S; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1095-110. PubMed ID: 12450335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]