These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17848484)

  • 1. Controversies in vascular screening art versus science.
    Rooke TW
    Vasc Med; 2007 Aug; 12(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 17848484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving screening practices for Barrett's esophagus.
    Shaheen NJ; Palmer LB
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2009 Jul; 18(3):423-37. PubMed ID: 19500734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness analysis for determining optimal cut-off of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for population-based colorectal cancer screening (KCIS 16).
    Chen LS; Liao CS; Chang SH; Lai HC; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 18078564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Body mass index measurement in schools.
    Nihiser AJ; Lee SM; Wechsler H; McKenna M; Odom E; Reinold C; Thompson D; Grummer-Strawn L
    J Sch Health; 2007 Dec; 77(10):651-71; quiz 722-4. PubMed ID: 18076411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using otoacoustic emissions to screen for hearing loss in early childhood care settings.
    Eiserman WD; Hartel DM; Shisler L; Buhrmann J; White KR; Foust T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 72(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 18276019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of screening in melanoma.
    Stratigos AJ; Katsambas AD
    Clin Dermatol; 2009; 27(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 19095150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New screening guidelines for colorectal cancer: a practical guide for the primary care physician.
    Allison JE; Potter MB
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):575-602. PubMed ID: 19616156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer: evidence, controversies and future perspectives.
    Ito K
    Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 19341365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cancer screening - pros, cons, choice, and the patient.
    Trevena L
    Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 19350066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for postpartum depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): an ethical analysis.
    Krantz I; Eriksson B; Lundquist-Persson C; Ahlberg BM; Nilstun T
    Scand J Public Health; 2008 Mar; 36(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 18519287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical issues in the evaluation of screening and early detection modalities.
    Etzioni R
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 18452826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening strategies for autism spectrum disorders in pediatric primary care.
    Pinto-Martin JA; Young LM; Mandell DS; Poghosyan L; Giarelli E; Levy SE
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2008 Oct; 29(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 18852608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pancreatic cancer screening: state of the art.
    Gemmel C; Eickhoff A; Helmstädter L; Riemann JF
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Feb; 3(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 19210116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mass colorectal cancer screening: methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity.
    Watine JC; Bunting PS
    Clin Biochem; 2008 May; 41(7-8):459-66. PubMed ID: 18226597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colon cancer screening and surveillance controversies.
    Lieberman D
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2009 Sep; 25(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 19465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives.
    Sabatino SA; Habarta N; Baron RC; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Kerner J; Coughlin SS; Kalra GP; Chattopadhyay S;
    Am J Prev Med; 2008 Jul; 35(1 Suppl):S67-74. PubMed ID: 18541190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer screening and biomarkers.
    Brooks M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 472():307-21. PubMed ID: 19107439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practice parameter: Assessing patients in a neurology practice for risk of falls (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
    Thurman DJ; Stevens JA; Rao JK;
    Neurology; 2008 Feb; 70(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 18250292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.