These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17848509)

  • 1. The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability.
    Gowaty PA; Anderson WW; Bluhm CK; Drickamer LC; Kim YK; Moore AJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Sep; 104(38):15023-7. PubMed ID: 17848509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental constraints on mate preferences in Drosophila pseudoobscura decrease offspring viability and fitness of mated pairs.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK; Gowaty PA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Mar; 104(11):4484-8. PubMed ID: 17360550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive compensation.
    Gowaty PA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1189-200. PubMed ID: 18564347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female mate preference and sexual conflict: females prefer males that have had fewer consorts.
    Harris WE; Moore PJ
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S64-71. PubMed ID: 15795863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine.
    Schmoll T; Dietrich V; Winkel W; Epplen JT; Schurr F; Lubjuhn T
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):645-57. PubMed ID: 15856706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Male Age Affects Female Mate Preference, Quantity of Accessory Gland Proteins, and Sperm Traits and Female Fitness in D. melanogaster.
    Rezaei A; Krishna MS; Santhosh HT
    Zoolog Sci; 2015 Jan; 32(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 25660692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance.
    Drickamer LC; Gowaty PA; Holmes CM
    Anim Behav; 2000 Feb; 59(2):371-378. PubMed ID: 10675259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.
    Harris WE; Uller T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 364(1520):1039-48. PubMed ID: 19324609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
    Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference status does not indicate intrinsic quality differences in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Kim YK; Weber MB; Anderson WW; Gowaty PA
    Integr Zool; 2010 Sep; 5(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 21392338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of male age, sperm age and mating history on fecundity and fertilization success in the hide beetle.
    Jones TM; Elgar MA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Jun; 271(1545):1311-8. PubMed ID: 15306356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polyandry enhances offspring viability with survival costs to mothers only when mating exclusively with virgin males in
    Castrezana S; Faircloth BC; Bridges WC; Gowaty PA
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(18):7515-7526. PubMed ID: 28944035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impaired sperm quality, delayed mating but no costs for offspring fitness in crickets winning a fight.
    Tuni C; Perdigón Ferreira J; Fritz Y; Munoz Meneses A; Gasparini C
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1643-7. PubMed ID: 27116908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild.
    Fisher DO; Double MC; Blomberg SP; Jennions MD; Cockburn A
    Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7115):89-92. PubMed ID: 17080089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of familiarity and preference in reproductive success in ex situ breeding programs.
    Martin MS; Shepherdson DJ
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Aug; 26(4):649-56. PubMed ID: 22809353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Male dominance, female mate choice, and intersexual conflict in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).
    Casalini M; Agbali M; Reichard M; Konecná M; Bryjová A; Smith C
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):366-76. PubMed ID: 19154367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.
    Moura RR; Gonzaga MO
    Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Apr; 104(3-4):28. PubMed ID: 28289773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lek mating system of the worm pipefish (Nerophis lumbriciformis): a molecular maternity analysis and test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis.
    Monteiro NM; Carneiro D; Antunes A; Queiroz N; Vieira MN; Jones AG
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 26(5):1371-1385. PubMed ID: 27864914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.