344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17849165)
1. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can magnetic resonance imaging be used to select patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy in prophylactic mastectomy?
McLaughlin SA; Stempel M; Morris EA; Liberman L; King TA
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1214-21. PubMed ID: 18257089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging identifies multifocal and multicentric disease in breast cancer patients who are eligible for partial breast irradiation.
Al-Hallaq HA; Mell LK; Bradley JA; Chen LF; Ali AN; Weichselbaum RR; Newstead GM; Chmura SJ
Cancer; 2008 Nov; 113(9):2408-14. PubMed ID: 18823018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.
Meeuwis C; Peters NH; Mali WP; Gallardo AM; van Hillegersberg R; Schipper ME; van den Bosch MA
Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 17218074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in early breast cancer: implications for partial breast irradiation.
Tendulkar RD; Chellman-Jeffers M; Rybicki LA; Rim A; Kotwal A; Macklis R; Obi BB
Cancer; 2009 Apr; 115(8):1621-30. PubMed ID: 19224552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.
Hartman AR; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Mills MA; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Kingham KE; Chun NM; Herfkens RJ; Ford JM; Plevritis SK
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 14745863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Sakakibara M; Nagashima T; Sangai T; Nakamura R; Fujimoto H; Arai M; Kazama T; Hashimoto H; Nakatani Y; Miyazaki M
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jul; 207(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18589363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique?
Tozaki M; Yamashiro N; Suzuki T; Kawano N; Ozaki S; Sakamoto N; Abe S; Ogawa T; Katayama N; Tsunoda Y; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18807122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bilateral breast MR imaging: is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer?
Ozaki S; Tozaki M; Fukuma E; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Sakamoto N; Higa K; Abe S; Ogawa T; Tsunoda Y; Nobuhito K
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 18317885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical significance of breast MRI in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on needle biopsy.
Miyashita M; Amano G; Ishida T; Tamaki K; Uchimura F; Ono T; Yajima M; Kuriya Y; Ohuchi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 23592884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: an automatic trigger for excisional biopsy?
McGhan LJ; Pockaj BA; Wasif N; Giurescu ME; McCullough AE; Gray RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3264-9. PubMed ID: 22878619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.
Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Freehand MRI-guided preoperative needle localization of breast lesions after MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy without marker placement.
van de Ven SM; Lin MC; Daniel BL; Sareen P; Lipson JA; Pal S; Dirbas FM; Ikeda DM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 20575077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast cancer underestimation rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core-needle biopsy under imaging guidance.
Wiratkapun C; Wibulpholprasert B; Lertsithichai P; Pulpinyo K; Wongwaisayawan S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Apr; 88(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 16146248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
